Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

mav1

Members
  • Posts

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by mav1

  1. So how does manufacturing capacity compare between ww2 and now?( So how faster can you produce equipment now compared to ww2? ) Also how does the bombing of bombers in ww2 in destructive capacity compare to the fighter bombers of today?

    What Iam trying to find out is would a ww2 in 2006 have lasted longer or shorter than ww2. Using info on manufacturing capacity, industry and bombing power. would the socity of today cope better in rebuilding damaged factory's than ww2 or would todays society collapse much faster in a war?

    Its theoritical questions for those who like to think theoritical.

  2. I read a osprey book about the fighting in lorraine 1944. The book says that artillery fire was effective in disturbing and breaking up german armored attacks. looking at the figures in the book, artillery fire was more useful in knocking out tanks than aircraft. So what do everyone else think about the effectiveness of artillery fire against tanks? Also is it represented realisticly in cm?

    [ November 11, 2006, 03:12 AM: Message edited by: mav1 ]

  3. I have a list of lesser known German afv's, that Iam wanting to know if they were used operationaly? If so when and where? I thank you for your help in advance.

    7.5 cm pak 40 raupenschlepper ost

    p-40

    pz I 37cm aa

    panzer II ausf g

    panzer II ausf J

    panzer 38t neuer art

    panzer I ausf c

    panzer I ausf f

    sturmgeshutz flame thrower

    sd kfz 251/23

    3.7 cm pak 35 zugkraftwagen It

    5 cm pak 38 zugkraftwagen 1t

    maultier aa

    sturmgeshutz m43 75/46

    somua 7.5cm pak 40

    b-2 flamm

    b-2

    b-2 10.5cm lefh 18

    fcm 10.5 lefh 16

    fcm 7.5 pak 40

    matilda II 5cm kwk L/42

    3.7cm pak universal carrier

    10.5cm lefh 16 mkIV (British)

    panzerjager Bren

    geschutzagen IV 10,5 cm lefh 18

  4. Its easy for me to to do a flame job. When one of my shermans gets knocked out, I get a lovely flame and I don't even have to mod. smile.gif

    Iam not surprised the US carried on using the sherman, it keeped the troops warm sitting next to the blazing fire in the winter months.

    [ October 16, 2006, 05:58 AM: Message edited by: mav1 ]

  5. Originally posted by Battlefront.com:

    At the moment, you can not add extra variations without overriding the defaults. And for a very good reason... VRAM usage. For example, today we were discussing various modifications to how buildings are textured. One idea, that Dan and I really liked, would have filled up a 128MB card just for one type of building. Doh :D It's just a reminder that there is limited space to sock these textures away in and we're going to have little extra room to play with.

    Steve

    Well then, are there going to be more buildings, faces and terrain to choose from. It just looked too samey in cmx1.
  6. Originally posted by Corvidae:

    Mav1? the 60mm mortar IS on map, and ONLY on map,,, And they are VERY highly visible

    I meant 60mm mortars being used as map artillery being invisable. If you have a map larger than 4km then off map small calibre mortars should be visable on the battle map. I played a game 4km long, with 60mm mortars off map when there was no mortars on the map, so the mortars must have been invisable on the map.

    I get the feeling I have made a mistake. redface.gif

    I better find out before people read this and find out that I have made an arse out of myself.

    Yes, what I meant was 80mm not 60mm off map mortars being on the map when the map was longer than 4km. Please forgive my earlier statement as an unfortunate cock up.

    [ October 11, 2006, 05:26 AM: Message edited by: mav1 ]

×
×
  • Create New...