Jump to content

Santosdiablo

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by Santosdiablo

  1. For the millionth time we are not the same person and that breaking all the rules is just bull**** You borke the rules Your violating the rules in no way improved the article And if we were the same person I would have reported you to an admin directly after you hade broken the rules Also the fact that it took you several days to understand somethintg that HE understod in a few seconds proves that you are an idiot. The fact beeing that the numbers of destroyed tanks could have come from more then just one divission. He pointed out that several days before you understod it. And as I said before I will support anyone who reverts you I wont just revert you but support anyone who does but you are ofcurse to stupid to understand the difference. And you have alomst restored everything you deleted on the 7th of June. Which proves that you did nothing but vandalize the page at first.
  2. REad the Guide lines and you will see that what you did was not allowed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable_on_Wikipedia Don't misrepresent other people: As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. And no for the second time We are not the same person. And as I said I will support his edits, he hasent made any edits since the last time he told you not to touch his edits which the guidelines point out is not allowed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable_on_Wikipedia Don't misrepresent other people: As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. As anyone with half a brain can see it is not allowed to edits other people comments. There are no 2 ways about it or cant you read.
  3. It is vandalism plain and simple you moved around his edits and deleted half of it. You can even read about such specific actions in the wiki guidelines that moveing other peoples comments around and deleting them is not allowed. I will support anything he does, also if sometime in the future someone for what ever reason comes into an edit war with you I will also support that person.
  4. My sock puppet? I dont think so But you replied before I could edit my post here This is what he replied first http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ilyushin_Il-2/Archive_1&oldid=59290469 Then you changed it to this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ilyushin_Il-2/Archive_1&oldid=59297207 This is a better way to view things. I dont use sock puppets since they are not allowed, unlike you I dont break the rules
  5. You make it sound that you didnt do anything but fact is fact you split up his post and deleted half of it as can be seen here His original http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIlyushin_Il-2%2FArchive_1&diff=59290469&oldid=59284051 And after your arrogantism http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIlyushin_Il-2%2FArchive_1&diff=59297207&oldid=59290469 Half his post got moved half got deleted, non of which is allowed
  6. Great Do you have any more I am looking for early war tanks with camo that link had some but I want more Cant stand Grey
  7. I have downloaded some mods but I need a rule-set to use them It has been a long time since I changed the mods so I have forgotten all about rule sets I downloaded this mod "Pz II C / F - Bi green cammo" By "Makjager" From "2003-11-13" What rule-set do I need to install it and where do I get it
  8. No what you did was vandalism you Did move his stuff around And you are so arrogant you first Vandalize then says he is immature And you call him a vandal The only one immature here is you because you did alter his post And even more to his credit he has not touced the article. He re added things that you deleted things that had been sourced then you removed it again and what did he do he posted on the talk page To which you replied and then he make a second post to which you totally vandalized There arent admins on every page watching everything that everyone does You are arrogant plain and simple, calling him immature and a vandal when in fact it is you who has vandalized tha page and it is you who are immature. And to this day you still havent replied to his post. The link you gave is pure crap. And dosent do anything, as I said before either reply to him or you will be up to your neck in ****.
  9. Where can I get some non-Grey-German tanks mods Does anyone have a link to some non grey early war german tank mods?
  10. Still no reply michael, you deleted and moved his posts around like you own the place and then you dare do it a second time and still no reply. Either reply to him or I will step in and **** you real hard He is the man, he has such diciplin he hasent touched the article and waits for your reply, and the only thing you can do is act all arrogant and remove his posts and move them around. In other words you are a bully or alteast a wannabe. Why did he say dont delete move or hide my posts so many times Maybe because you deleted and hid his posts. Which is not allowed.
  11. Yupp, I am an editor on wiki and I know that it is forbidden to remove stuff from the talk page except obvoius vandalism like pneis boobies and penis Look just reply to him without makeing him so angry and everyone will be happy Also you will see that he hasent touched the article page which I might unless you reply to him Fight the power! I can see that he is also new, maybe that is the main factor in his anger because it is very hard for him to follow your edits. Cut him a **** load of slack and go the extra mile for him [ June 18, 2006, 05:20 PM: Message edited by: Santosdiablo ]
  12. I looked into the page, and I can see that you are makeing lots of friends... Maybe you could NOT delete that dudes stuff and maybe he wouldnt be so angry. And maybe just maybe you could try to reply to him without as he says it "moveing everything around"
  13. Nope it syas nothing special but I did re do the mission and things did start to move so maybe ti was just a bug or maybe it is ment to be played between humans
  14. Hello I selected that mission and chose to play on the Soviet Side the thing is that the computer playing as the Germans didnt do anything he just sat there and the turns went to an end and I won by doing absolutely nothing
  15. I cant figure out how or where to click so that my troops can enter the battle in different turns. How and where to I click in the quick battle to be able to have troops enter on turns that is not the starter turn. when i click up to the left the only black option is the on table now option but all the reinforcment options are allways gray
  16. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwtwo/soviet_german_war_01.shtml Click next a few times An exceptional burden was borne by Soviet women. By 1945 over half the workforce was female, and on the land, more than four-fifths. Women fought in their thousands in the Soviet armed forces as pilots, sharpshooters, even tank commanders. Many women joined the partisan movement operating behind the German lines - and by 1943 there were an estimated 300,000 of them. They constantly harried German troops, and were themselves the victim of harsh punitive expeditions, which led to the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent villagers along with the partisan bands.
  17. In the mission Rude Awakening 440pts 1941 15 turn small there are Partisans with funky clothes I would like to play with similar units in qucik battle but cant seem to find them so how do I select them in quick battle?
  18. When I look at the battles I find it very hard to play any battle made for Soviet in a defensive position most battles are either Soviet attack or german defense or german attack only a very few are ment to be played as Soviet defense So people should make more battles where the Soviets are the in defensive postion and the axis as the aggressor
×
×
  • Create New...