stoat
-
Posts
1,338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by stoat
-
-
The Life of David Hasselhoff, Chapter 19: Playing in the Sand.
-
If the war ends on Christmas, you have 79 shopping days before hostilities cease.
-
90 degrees represents an infinite slope. 0 degrees equals no slope.
-
No intelligible person with half a brain would post in this thread.
-
Uranium, man. It's the 21st century.
-
Then in future, everyone will hate you for plant too many mines cause many children lost limbs as they wander around. It is sort of unfair in game. </font>Originally posted by Snow Leopard:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by sgtgoody (esq):
So far the major effect of all the things people want would be to make the average game much longer. I'm talking platoon actions taking several hours.
For the record though I would like to be able to buy so many square feet of mines at such and such density and then kind of paint it on the battlefield. I would also like mixed fields of AP and AT.
-
Can you be sure each hit is a sure kill? Just wait until some merely immobilized AFV turns on you with a vengeance and you lose all of the team's rockets, instead of the extra one it took to ensure a solid kill.
-
Only if it is below 75 degrees Farenheit. Otherwise you're better off with a lum of 15.
-
25x25 pixels? That is obviously a full penetration of the left hull of a Sherman M4A3 by a 50mm L/60 Pak38 AP round at 23 degrees, 198 meters, 41 percent humidity, with a barometric pressure of 29.66, in 1944.
-
You could have just bumped the "capture the flag" thread.
-
They had light, medium, and heavy tank divisions. They did not use them effectively, with the notable exception of the battle of Gembleaux. The Char bi(s) could shred German armor and tanks like the S-35 were better than anything save pz IVs.Originally posted by Blashy:France had a tank division when WW2 started, it was actually of better quality than anyone else.
But, they had no clue on how to use them effectively. And were outgunned in every other area.
-
Won't it have an effect when we play battalion and larger sized scenarios?
-
What was your source(s)? I don't mean to imply anything, but it sounds like an interesting read.
-
Do you have any more examples? I'd like to see them all explained in detail.
-
They are aesthetically pleasing.
-
He probably gets Shermans just to watch them burn.
-
According to Belton Y. Cooper in his book "Death Traps" there were only two Super Pershings deployed and they hardly saw any action. If I recall correctly. </font>Originally posted by Crinius:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by michael_wittman44:
It would actually be good to know how many super pershings were deployed apart from the two that were described in the article at the top of the post.
-
Damn, that's rough. Why am I going again?
-
Then an oubliette in the Paraguayan jungle with sulfur coated walls and filled with flesh eating maggots where I will stay for all eternity with Pat Roberts listening to Captain and Tenneal on a continuous loop in a place where alcohol has yet to be discovered?
-
It certainly is a whale of a thread.
-
Nuclear weapons.
-
You're going to one of the less pleasant sections of Hell. Count on it. </font>Originally posted by Seanachai:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by stoat:
I had a couple of fifth grade girls go at it today.
-
You got me. And apparently on Sunday morning, too.Originally posted by CanadaGuy:This thread may not be life altering but I am replying to three guys (Stoat, DogFace and K.A. Miles) who had nothing better to do on a Saturday night except reply to this thread.
This is just something to while away the time until we get some concrete news. Apparently I have nothing better to do on a Saturday night either but to reply to you.
-
There should be a thread devoted to keeping track of these "CMx2 setting" threads.
Abrams tank
in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Posted