Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

Earl Grey

Members
  • Posts

    1,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Earl Grey

  1. We are desperate and bored, and that leads to political debates.
    So what if the above is the primary cause of all political debates in the first place? It would at least explain why in my country all politicians seem to behave like three-year olds often enough...

    And I won't go into discussing what a government is really for, anyway - because that'd be a philosophical question and I could as well start a new thread here! ;)

  2. Right, the alpha channel... right, it's .DDS format. Should have been clear in the first place. *slaps on forehead*

    Now I only have to figure out how this alpha channel works - last timwe I tried, the result was far from satisfactory...

  3. Thanks for all the inforamtion!

    By the way, anyone knows what color I need to get transparent parts? I don't have installed the .DDS plugin for Photo Shop, therefore converted teh .DDS into another format and converted it back, but a few texture parts now behave in an odd way...

  4. Seems sensible enough. Just one thing, though: If LoS/LoC gets severed between the Bn HQ and its respective subordinates, I have to stop giving orders to the subordinate HQ's - is that correct?

    Because: I get my orders from my Bn CO at the start of the battle and follow them until told otherwise. In what situation should I as, say, a Coy CO stop and wait for new ordesr when I, in fact, actually have them? Should I write down specific orders/circumstances when they apply etc and then check every turn if I'd have to change my initial strategy?

    Maybe I'm making it more complicated than it already is, but I LOVE this game and would so much like to see it improved...

  5. It'd be nice if the AI had the same restrictions, though... If I have to wait 60 turns (if we count real-time) to get my combat platoons moving, I can just bloody well stop playing. ;)

    How'd that delay work within wargaming rules? I know only few systems and you may know just one that can be called a 'real' wargame (FoW), so my knowledge isn't that representative...

  6. @BigDuke: Disproportionate in the amount of APCR firing guns you have to go against. That's what I meant. I still have to get used to it...

    @the_enigma: I killed a lot of T-34's as well, but in the end, it just wasn't enough. Number of guns is in favor of the Soviets, it's just the T-34's armor that isn't as good as the Panther's.

  7. The glacis plate is just the frontal armor.

    By the way, the T-34 in 'Message from Goetz' have a disproportionate amount of APCR rounds - some tanks even as much as 7. Those punch through a Panther's armor like butter and engagement ranges in that scenario are well under 500m (at least when I played it) - if you're not constantly moving backwards.

  8. Well, checked everything I have and found - nothing. I have to admit I don't have the Panzer Tracts volumes right now...

    Official agreement seems to be nobody knows anything - it MIGHT be the versions A, B and C were initially reserved for different production models that were never produced. I remember reading somewhere else that maybe the plans got disordered, though I highly doubt that theory.

    So in the end the theory of confusing the enemy is as likely as everything else. My guess is there WAS a system, but what the actual letters stand for, I have no clue about...

    [ June 18, 2007, 09:31 PM: Message edited by: Earl Grey ]

  9. There's an explanation for the designation of the different types somewhere in my sources... just have to find it. I own way to many books about the Panther by now - and I don't own 'em all yet!

    @MikeyD: You'll be surprised what I did to improve your outstanding mods even furhter. Just need a little more time... by the way: when are you going to mod again? ;)

×
×
  • Create New...