taxiu

Happy to say that pre-order has been placed.

Is it a bug or intended feature change when capital changes to already occupied city. France: Paris -> Algiers. After Paris has been occupied, capital moves to Algiers regardless whether it's occupied or not. England: If Manchester & London is occupied by Axis capital moves to Alexandria regardless if it's already occupied. Instead of England surrendering. I couldn't find any where if this feature changed by v1.02 it wasn't like that in v1.01.

5475

Is it a normal/acceptable behaviour that when Germany first declare war to baltic states and then conquers Riga and after that declares war to Russia. It gives a notification "baltic states changes sides" and all the units currently there will lose all their supply to supply 0 and Riga turns to Soviet city eventhough there is German corps in the city? So in order to conquer baltic states I have to leave the city and come back there again.

Male, 30, Finland

Operators and fellow members. I urge you to join the cause to have our fellow member Zappswedens post: TCP/IP Strategic Command league at www.myleague.com/strategic To be placed under important postings list aka. sticky So that it would remain in top of all posting then it would be found easily and everybody would have change to join. -- Perttu Isotalo

My contact info: ICQ: 6911641 Email: pisotalo@isotalo.org I will play occasionally SC TCP/IP game

If you are facing compatibility problems with old DOS games in WinXP try program called: Abandon Loader, it's helps you set different parameters to programs and you can adjust game speed too. VDMSounds helps fix those sound problems. I found these when tried to play Pools of Radiance from back 1988 and they work fine. I haven't tested these with strategy games yet. Both are freeware. Can be downloaded from: Downloads: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/zeroone VDMSound: http://ntvdm.cjb.net for more information. Hope this helps

Well you clearly had made your point clear. It is clear to me that Finland situation was different than another countries in the war. These points you made have been discussed since the war ended, most of them in my point of the view are political questions. I tried to point out what he did with his divisions in the front against russia. Not what in generally happened in war. After -39 surprise attack by the russians there were only Germany which offered material support. Even finnish army got 100 planes from the US. In summer -40 the situation was "Conquer or to be conquered". In finns in my mind there wouldn't be a possibility to remain as neutral territory since the fear from russian or germany occupation. Worst case scenario would have been that both parties have fought each another in finlands territory. Also what I didn't point out that Mannerheim tried to hide the finnish army goals so that war in Finlands front would not get too much attention since russians would have deployed more troops there earlier and which eventually would have lead collaption of whole finnish front much earlier. In the summer -44 there where nothing else do to than drive Germans out of the country since it was agreed so in peace treaty. Only reason why to sign this treaty was not to have Finland occupied which never happened as it did for the rest of the axis forces. Finns mainly fought their own battles for own reasons not because they liked nazi idealogy, mainly because they did see opportunity to strike back and reclaim the land which was taken during Winter War. Well as you said not good politician, but much more effient in the battles. Became president of Finland only to get finns out of the war. Since russians trusted him so much that if Mannerheim would be behind peace treaty finns surely would stop fighting. But if you want to write more about this I would gladly discuss this via email

Everybody here is talking who is the best general in WWII and telling their own candidates usually from either US or from Germany. I personally would say that I would vote C.G.Mannerheim. My opinion is that nobody could have achive better results with the resources he had available. In US, Germany, Russia and even Italy had huge resources compared to Finland. Where as the finns only had to face Russian man and material overforce from the -39 until -44. Still finns were able to blockout and destroy entire russian divisions during the war. Finns had less than 20 infantry divisions facing usually 2 or 3 times bigger forces in battles. Mannerheim was realistic that he knew what will the outcome of the war be so finns never destroyed Murmansk track where the shipments came from the US nor did they launch attacks against Leningrad. This was only to get better positions in peace negotiations. Mannerheims skills has been also regocnized in the russian army where he served before his time in Finland with many medals during 1887-1917.