Jump to content

tiny_tanker

Members
  • Posts

    195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About tiny_tanker

  • Birthday 03/22/1985

Converted

  • Location
    Kansas, USA
  • Interests
    gaming, photography
  • Occupation
    College Student

tiny_tanker's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (3/3)

0

Reputation

  1. The slat armor is designed to defeat the RPG-7 specifically, since its most prevalent in Iraq, and its probably not to effective against anything else. Lt Mike, I've worked with the 3-2 on multiple occasions over the last few years, in an indirect and visual nature if you follow me. You guys do good work.
  2. They were also designed more for the special ops type units, which the pathfinders fall into. I think the idea was to get good armament with ied protection and good load carrying capacity. From my understanding the snatch landrover is still the main mode of transport for your standard troops and its pretty comparable to HMMWV.
  3. They were actually dropping the 25mm Gatling guns and the 40mm bofors for two 30mm bushmasters.
  4. The only thing is predators aren't designed for CAS missions, not that it can't take two aimed shots, its going to be up there for about 15 hours providing overwatch or intel to the ground troops. From the commanders perspective you'd just about eliminate the fog of war aspect if you had one on station. I'm not sure how you'd add that to the game. The Reaper would actually be a more appropriate addition since it is a CAS platform by nature. You'd get more bang for your buck to, 16 hellfires (eventually) and 2 gbu's. Another option is the MQ-1C (see the army's Warrior for reference), adds another pair of hellfires and has better sensors and should be replacing the B models some day. Of course I'm not sure big airforce has actually sat down and thought about how these will be used in a real war, still a little bit of that "ooo look at the cool remote control plane" mentality out there..... and I think I've rambled enough now.
  5. Didn't they drop a daisy cutter down there somewhere? That would have had some good seismic activity.
  6. So I guess its a good thing i got up and went to work today....
  7. Not to justify the charge but anti tank mines where the big threat before IED's in afghanland.
  8. And of course they like to break things... and you can't buy people who break stuff nice things That and there budget keeps getting blown on "stealth" ships.
  9. All joking aside, this happens whenever a new technology or experiment appears that has some slim possibility to destroy mankind as we know it. I mean take nuclear weapons/energy, same thing "oh god we're all going to die". Its just natural to protest against something that they think is scary
  10. So what your saying is this is a win-win situation either way.
  11. Couldn't the black hole just swallow us up and we wouldn't even know the difference? Wouldn't it grow to swallow the universe around us? Is it just me or is it ironic that the Swiss are going to destroy the world and possibly the universe?
  12. I for one think this planet has had a good run and embrace our crushy doom.
  13. Except its actually just an improvised rocket, not a mortar at all. I suppose you could compare the two John, but it reality the propane cylinders are only used because they are plentiful, cheap and a good size for a large amount of explosives and concealment in a truck. The use of a gas cylinder is more of a coincidence than anything else.
×
×
  • Create New...