-
Posts
1,242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Reputation Activity
-
Meach got a reaction from kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 TUNISIA 43 PBEM DAR
Good game and well played! Always a pleasure to cross pixels with you
-
Meach reacted to kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 TUNISIA 43 PBEM DAR
oh ok, I will try not to show the Firefly, Pershing and other parts of my OOB
-
Meach reacted to Vacillator in CMFI CMAK2 TUNISIA 43 PBEM DAR
I hope you two aren't reading each others' posts 😂.
Bogging - always a massive PITA! And always a massive relief if they don't immobilise a few seconds later...
-
Meach reacted to kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 TUNISIA 43 PBEM DAR
Nope, not an ASL translation. Just an old map I had that I spruced up a bit. Dusted off some old mods as well.
It is a QB map but doesn't have any AI plans for playing against the computer enemy.
My buddy Chris is Scottish. I think he prefers a QB so he can exercise his national attribute of being a bit...shall we say frugal(?) with his unit purchases.
I am just joking. He likes QB versus a scenario with particular units mandated.
-
Meach reacted to kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 AFRIKA MODS EXPLOSION
Thanks for the battle Chris.
Next time Tunisia 1943 and you are the Hun
-
Meach got a reaction from kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 AFRIKA MODS EXPLOSION
Yup, the Knobford Forester Rgt has had enough and it's time for tea and sandwiches. Sadly they didn't reach the objective so it's time to gather around the briefing table and think up a new strategy! Well played, very enjoyable game and congrats on the win
-
Meach got a reaction from kohlenklau in CMFI CMAK2 AFRIKA MODS EXPLOSION
Very enjoyable so far. I am not sure my long range fire support is doing very well but there is only so far you can throw a Haggis!!
-
Meach reacted to Pelican Pal in Tactical Lifehack
I've been enjoying the discussion on this thread, but I honestly don't get the absolute need to convince each other of your positions.
Oleksandr has laid out his reasoning several times and you might not agree with it, and that is fine. I personally don't agree with his opinion on it, but I think his line of thinking is interesting to read.
I also enjoyed reading the strong replies to his position. BTR, Chudacabra, Erwin, AKD, HerrTom, CptMiller's first post (even if a bit snippy) all added good content to the thread.
It created a richer conversation about something that would otherwise not be talked about. I wouldn't have AKD's link for instance without this discussion.
But holy **** guys. Do you absolutely need to string together a bunch of snarky, personally attacking posts that don't add any functional content to the thread just because someone likes the design ethos of the BMP-3 (Our IFV is both a weapon and a VBIED), seriously? Like RSulomon, is Oleksandrs' opinion really such a big deal that you have to make some weirdo post asking if he understands opinions can be wrong? Great guys, Oleksandr doesn't like the Stryker, many of you have made cogent arguments to the opposite of that, but do we really need to write a bunch of internet trash so you can "win" your argument? We don't need this whiny internet trash.
Now ironically my complaint about internet trash has put further litter in this thread. But I expect better conduct here than some random reddit thread where every user is just trying to declare themselves the winner of some ****ty internet argument. Let **** go sometimes, you don't always need to "win"...