AutomaticFire

Welcome, Four Stringer! I'm still looking for more opponents. Let me know if you want to play TacOps TCP/IP or PBEM.

Chicago, Illinois

Scenarios are more fun in the sense that the terrain is more humanized and the orders of battle more realistic. Also, meeting engagements kinda get boring after a while.

I was surfing the web for some new scenario ideas and stumbled upon the North Korean Military Guide at globalsecurity.org. This is a very informative website with maps, equipment guides, orders of battle, strategy and tactics for North Korea and other regions of potential conflict. Does anyone already have a scenario for two-players set in this region? If so, please e-mail me. Note: I'm interested in playing a scenario that will use amphibious and engineering assets (to clear obstacles and lay bridges) in the less mountainous regions of western North Korea.

E-mail me please.

E-mail me with your preferences.

Looking for an opponent.

Only Americans have this type of artillery, I think.

Variable timing artillery - shells that explode overhead. One shell can wipe out a platoon.

Don't purchase MGs. Get Vet bazookas and save up for VT artillery.

Argh! You beat me to it! :eek:

Has anyone played this scenario as the US with unit change of BMP2->BTR80 and the game set on default prefs? I'd like to know how you fared.

Much of the delay is due to unfamiliarity with IRC and tardiness.

CPX = Command Post Exercise http://www.battlefront.com/resources/tacops/HQ/text/CPX/cpxfaq.txt You may want to read this FAQ. It's a bit out-of-date but it's a good introduction.

You might want to join the TacOps mailing list. http://lists.perilpoint.com/mailman/listinfo/tacops