Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

Mr. Clark

Members
  • Posts

    1,032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Mr. Clark

  1. I kinda agree the Tanker...

    BUT, at the scale of the game, since you don't want to go dropping large Airborne units TOO deep into enemy territory, I think you will be able to simulate air drops simply by attacking with a combination of air power and infantry units. (Basically, Airborne units could be assumed to be a part of the battle.)

    At least that should work until we get our Airborne patch! ;)

  2. I would suspect that we will be able to play the campaign from both sides in solo play.

    YAY! A whole campaign (though only a one year game)... WOO HOO! And PBEM!

    Immer - PBEM is playing against someone online, but taking turns via E-Mail. YOu take your turn, and then attach a file to an E-Mail and send it to your opponent. He then does the same and sends it back to you. Combat Mission has this feature and its GREAT!

    Looking forward to the Demo more than ever now...

  3. If I remember correctly, the production thing was for building actual units... so you could still get "points" for other territories, just not build there if there is no direct line. (I could be wrong, but I think I'm correct.)

    Para - I totally agree! I'm more impressed with every new question answered!

  4. WOW! Another fine job!

    Why isn't this game coming out tommorrow!!??

    I NEED it!

    EDIT:

    Actually a question now comes to mind, to go along with Para's.

    Somewhere it was stated that production can only occur in cities that can draw a direct (land) link to a capital. Does the capture of a capital affect production then?

    [ April 24, 2002, 01:52 PM: Message edited by: Mr. Clark ]

  5. That would be kinda cool!

    I just want something we can all play (possibly by E-Mail), discuss, and play again while waiting for the final version. One, or two (CM demo had two!) complete little scenarios would be SWEET! It would also allow us who STILL have ancient PC's to find out if they cut the mustard or not.

    One complete scenario... that's all I ask...

  6. Hearts of Iron is real-time, and Strategic Command is turn-based. I prefer turn-based 100% to real time.

    Can you stop peddling that other game around here? Isn't this the second or third thread where I have seen you mentioning that crap?

  7. Okay, I'll stop whining about Airborne. It would still be damn nice shiny chrome if it could be added in a later patch!

    I guess I'd rather have the game sooner, than wait for new stuff to be added.

    I hope we can play the DEMO PBEM!!! Either way, I can't frigging wait!

  8. I'm still looking forward to this game, but I'm majorly bummed about the lack of Airborne! :( From the moment I heard about this game I've had visions of a Market Garden scenario in my head...

    Overall, Airborne will be sorely missed. PLEASE consider adding them, either for release or for an early patch! Please?

  9. Man! Everything about this game just sounds GREAT!

    I can't wait for the Demo.

    I'd also like to know a little more about research (though perhaps I should scan all the other threads before asking.)

    I also wonder, will "the bomb" and the race to create it be dealt with at all, or saved for the later sequel?

  10. This game sounds FANTASTIC so far!

    I can't wait for the demo! (or the real thing)

    Random DEFINATELY sounds like the way to play.

    Will the demo have PBEM capability? (like the Combat Mission one does)

    Either way, can't wait!

×
×
  • Create New...