Jump to content

SF

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Location
    rhododendron,or,usa

SF's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

0

Reputation

  1. Same here, haven't purchased a Battlefront game since the original 3 CM games. Looking forward to this with great anticipation.
  2. 2-3 turns a day typically, spread among 1/2 doz or so concurrent games.
  3. 41 years young. Hey, anyone heard from Kitty in the last few years?
  4. wow, having waited almost six years since my last post, I'm definitly 'lurker' status.
  5. Off topic here, but are you the same Kappa from AH & AW?
  6. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Tiger: A "tank hunter" is a red-neck hillbilly that goes out and sits in a tree-stand with a high-powered scoped bazooker, swilling beer and chewing tobacco, waiting all day for a tank to innocently roll past it. Then he claims what a great hunter he is. -john [This message has been edited by Tiger (edited 11-19-2000).]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Hey! I resemble that remark! [This message has been edited by SF (edited 11-20-2000).]
  7. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Stoffel: Sorry Tanaka but thiis veheicles are included just like others. And it goes way out off line to tell someone not to use them. Most off the time I use one of these weapons because my opponent might have an airplane. If he has not than I use them for other purposes,and only after I managed to kill his armor. This week I started another pbem and for the first time I hadn't bought one of these vehicles and to my suprise my opponent bought a plane. What should I do now ban him from my favourite players because he did so...?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Using one of these vehicles in CM in any role other than AA is gamey as hell. ONLY because you are taking advantage of a flaw in the way CM models attacks vs soft skin vehicles [This message has been edited by SF (edited 11-18-2000).]
  8. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Pillar: The M18 and the Jackson are popular vehicles for Allied CM players on this forum. Through my very brief readings on armoured warfare after World War 2, I've never found much light shed on the fate of the Tank Destroyer concept. The closest thing I could find was the Sheridan, but that's more of an airborne light tank than a classic TD. The US Army was thinking of developing a TD recently for Airborne troops that would replace the role of the Sheridan. I think that got canned. My question to the grogs is: What happened to the Tank Destroyer after World War 2? What did the concept get replaced by/mould into? Thanks.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> The latest TD produced that I can think of was the Swedish 'S' tank. Had alot of novel features, and looked quite radical.
  9. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Pvt. Ryan: There is an indication of a building's status. One * indicates moderate damage, and two ** indicates get the hell out cause the sucker's gonna go. You can see the status by clicking on the unit inside the building, but I am not sure if there is a way to check an unoccupied building other than with the LOS or move tool.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Shift G will display building damage.
  10. IIRC from the thread at tech support, Steve said we'd be getting an update on the tcp/ip patch this week some time.
  11. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rommel22: Ok, but why HAMSTERS. why not represent these guys as rakoons??? Funny pictures though. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Duh! RACOONS don't play in Habitrails!
  12. any problems with the gun changing facing? of more than like 15-20 degree's?
  13. The graphics that come on the cd leave something to be desired, but after getting a few mod's put in there's enough eye candy for all. Combine that with fantastic gameplay, what more could a wargamer want?
  14. was directed at Slappy, but until rereading it I didn't notice how sarcastic that sounded, so much to Peng's displeasure let me throw in a smilie or two
×
×
  • Create New...