Moon Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 It's human anatomy alright but the only posters saying ****** are usually spam bots so it's disabled. If it was up to me I'd disable a whole lot more because swearwords got our forum blacklisted in several places before, but overall the bad words filter is pretty liberal as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisND Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 I see that mee krob is not censored. It should be, please fix or sumfink. (If you get that reference, you watch too much TV) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomm Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 Back to the screenshots, please! Best regards, Thomm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theFightingSeabee Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 A short hunt on the net. A real-world AT-14. Looks like a flying 2 liter coca cola bottle. We can get the two litre to your door QUICK, but we're having problems with the pizza delivery system. -sorry for all my bad jokes today... but come on, it's Friday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Back to the screenshots, please! Best regards, Thomm OK. I like this....... Did I just breach my NDA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chainsaw Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Awsome! the 0.50 gunner is HOLDING the 0.50 instead of just having the arms alongside as they used to! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Awsome! the 0.50 gunner is HOLDING the 0.50 instead of just having the arms alongside as they used to! It's the little things that make me happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piecekeeper Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 One question....based on how long this module has taken....could we expect "more" from this module compared to the marine module? (chainsaw: inte bara jag som är uppe sent:)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chainsaw Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Elvis: Agreed, its all those small things that makes me happy (too) Piecekeeper: well my excuse is that I work night, so I go up at 15:00 and to bed at 08:00, so im not up late Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piecekeeper Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Well...me too....never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Tiger Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 These three pictures were taken with quite early builds and so are old now. But I have some new ones that I'm preparing for later today... I have to confess that this next one is one of my favourites even though it's the oldest of the three. And another, this one of Scimitars from the same action as the first screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 You notice we've opted for 'petite' scenario maps this time around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yair Iny Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Wow, the maps in those last couple of pics look amazing! On another note, this is one of the funniest threads in a long time, first Bergerbitz's identification of his ex-wife as an in game vehicle and then GeorgeMc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 One question....based on how long this module has taken....could we expect "more" from this module compared to the marine module? Did this take longer than the Marine module? I've lost all track of time. It seemed like about the same amount of work - except poor Steve suffered horrors assembling an accurate British TO&E, which then cascaded down through the schedule. All praise to Steve for survivng the ordeal. A VERY rough estimate. Including both campaign and standalone scenarios, Brits might have an additional fifteen scenarios maybe. Its awfully hard to tell, I can't recall which USMC scenario in my folder was module and which was 3rd party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Tiger Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 There were sixteen scenarios shipped with the Marines module. The Brit module will ship with around 30. By the way, I feel it would be remiss of me to omit to post a piccy of these weird looking vehicles. And since there's no just new Brit stuff in this module, here are a couple of IBCT shots. The first one is a bit arty... from inside a Humvee just behind the driver, presumably taken on his buddy's cellphone. And of course, the new truck... with some wall jumping soldiers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Can you tell yet that the Beta guys are as excited about the coming release as everyone else? And Paper Tiger's line: from inside a Humvee just behind the driver You can tell we've worked a bit too hard on the Brit module if we're imagining our Humvees have right-hand steering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Tiger Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 if we're imagining our Humvees have right-hand steering Oops... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 John Johnston asks: I got's to know - AT-14 vs CR2 front armour, who won? The funny thing about that pict. That AT-14 literally (or should I say 'virtually') crossed paths with a big 120 HESH round going in the opposite direction! Unfortunately for the tank, HESH is a low-velocity shell so it dismantled the building the AT-14 launcher was perched on a half-second after the Kornet hit. Bow shot - three men managed to get out of the tank. If it had been an enhanced Challenger with the uparmored bow nose, who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Tiger Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Elvis... Did I just breach my NDA? Well, if you did, I'm royally screwed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 About the Beta guy NDA agreement. I believe at this point Charles might prefer the outer world to be jumping-up-and-down excited to get the game, and after 8+ months slaving we're only too willing to help in that regard. Now that I've got my own urge to blab out of my system, I'm returning to a discrete silence on the topic. Give the other over-excited Beta guys a chance to get themselves into trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George MC Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Oops See my 'off the cuff' comment might have been misconstrued... That word I used has a multitude of meanings, al of em depending on context and tone in which it is used. So yes it does describe 'wimmins bits' but in the context I used it means more why you being daft. So see, not as offensive as it might first have sounded For those who collect such phrases I've another, which for you guys 'over the water' will not sound all that bad but has those of us on the other side of the pond sniggering - "Don't be a fanny"... Think I better post some screenies latter today before I get banned... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian90 Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 If it had been an enhanced Challenger with the uparmored bow nose, who knows? Probably no. CR2's Lower Front Hull is a simple RHA plate (thick but only RHA) or two RHA plates with air gap in beetwen or simple ceramic matrix, nothing more. So with ERA ROMOR-A there are no chances that it protect even against PG-7VR or PG-29 or other big RPG or ATGM with tandem warhead, the AT-14 can do much damage even with bolt on addon Dorchester armor module, but maybe it will protect, who know's! But don't expect to much, module isn't thick and base armor also don't look like more than 200-250mm LOS, and Dorchester cavieties are only in glacis plate in both sides of center were driver seats, center part of glacis is thick (100-150mm LOS) RHA plate. I think so. Even M1's Lower Front Hull that have multilayer laminate armor with DU inserts, if been hit in the center where driver seat can be perforated or AT-14 achieve deep penetration. But in both tanks if AT-14 hit in the right or left side of front hull there will be no big damage i suppose, in the other hand CR2 got there battery's and some HESH rounds or propelant charges so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yardstick Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 And of course, the new truck... with some wall jumping soldiers I'm guessing from this photo that the M1114 isn't getting a proper turret. Is this correct? I find it odd that the LMTV has a fully enclosed turret that was designed for the M1114/M1151 series. In fact, I have yet to see an 1114 with out an enclosed turret IRL. Can some one confirm or deny this, please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Field Marshal Blücher Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 I'm guessing from this photo that the M1114 isn't getting a proper turret. Is this correct? I find it odd that the LMTV has a fully enclosed turret that was designed for the M1114/M1151 series. In fact, I have yet to see an 1114 with out an enclosed turret IRL. Can some one confirm or deny this, please? Pretty sure no M1114 with enclosed turret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yardstick Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Bummer. Thanks for the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts