Field Marshal Blücher Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 OK, I'm very glad that BFC increased the propensity of soldiers to give buddy aid to fallen comrades. It was earlier way too infrequent. But now, soldiers must really be after that Congressional Medal of Honor in a bad way. The way that it should be, I feel, is that soldiers give buddy aid to guys in their action spot, building floor, etc. But now I've noticed that men have a propensity to stick their necks out in ways that don't make sense. Two examples of this: 1) A squad on the second floor of a building took heavy fire and bugged out down to the first floor. This removed them from enemy LOS; they were safe. Then, some guy decides to go help his friend out IMMEDIATELY (before there's been enough time to deal with the threat), and promptly gets killed. This, by itself, was not nearly as frustrating as: 2) A squad took some fire running into a building and took a casualty outside the building entrance. They ran into the building and were safe. Then, one bright individual, literally as soon as he ceased to be pinned, ran right outside and began providing buddy aid to the guy and was promptly killed. Then ANOTHER genius did the exact same thing. I was forced to relocate the whole squad to prevent one man's death from causing eight more. This isn't a huge issue. It's only happened to me a couple of times. I've only mentioned it because it seems relatively easy to fix (i.e., for squads in buildings, restricting buddy aid to soldiers on their floor and in their building). Thanks for listening to me whine! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pvt. Ryan Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 In my experience they do wait until things calm down before going outside or to another floor in a building before trying to administer aid, but even so, they tend to put themselves in harm's way when they shouldn't. If a squad got blasted by a tank when it was on the fourth floor, and then ran down to the first floor to take cover, there's a good chance that tank will still be out there three minutes later and will shoot the guy with the band-aids. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandur Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 funny i wanted to create a thread about this not some houers ago. there are 2 things i see with medics; 1st - is the behaviour described, wich isnt nice but its no "bug", it just needs to be tweaked so they dont crawl around to action spots they are not in, to medic someone. as long as they do they gona crawl over the top/crest, around the corners and whatnot to medic guys and draw fire and die quiet often. 2nd - thing i see is clearly a "bug" as i see medics warp through fences/walls/housewalls to medic someone. if noone saw it so far i can elaborate further, but depending on the battle and the places where the action takes place it happens fairly often. someone should have seen it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigduke6 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Matter of taste, but I think self-sacrificing medics is terrific coding and one of the things that separates CM from the rest of the pack. Now if only they could do something about the nerve gas in the HE shells... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scipio Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Instead of recoding the medic, I propose that wounded soldiers get sound effects, so we hear them cry for pain and their mothers, what they likely do in reality. We currently do have the impression that all soldiers who are marked as 'wounded' are clean and unconcious. Of course this is not a serious request - but it would explain why sometimes soldiers run into fire, trying to save there brothers. Wound a soldiers and wait for the next idiot who tries to save him is also a common sniper tactic (AFAIC). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 deleted per user request 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meach Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 What you would do is grab the wounded guy on the ankles, lapels, or any part of his apendages you can reach, pull him back into cover then buddy aid him. If he's out in the open like Full Metal Jacket standard procedure is to provide covering fire and only approach once threats are neutralised. Now, when your buddy you been thru boots and basic with is lying with a sucking chest wound and looking you right in the eye and you know he's begging you to help him...... Scipio hit it right on the head, there is no emotional hook for us to get caught on when someone crawls right out into the open to buddy aid. We think..."NOOOO, not the SMAW guy!" cos we can be cold and rational about the tactical situation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdstrike Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I'd also say that the way buddy aid works now feels about right. Though I agree, sometimes it would be a good thing if a wounded soldier in a different action spot thant the rest of the squad would first be dragged to the squad's action spot before applying buddy aid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandur Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 the things you talk about right now are plausible and would be nice as feature but we have it as a "glitch", or i would call it like that. i dont think its human to crawl out to buddy aid someone for 2 or 3 minutes under fire in the open to get shot and the next rat is commin out of the hole crawling to medic these guys. and the next and the next. hell even rats would get it but the human squad does kill itself as a whole if you dont stop this by relocateing them. that is too much, this is pulling on my nerves, iam playing the commander here and not the oh so understanding buddy of the guy shot. same with the Magic David medics warping through solid walls to medic someone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meach Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I agree about the chain-medic phenomenon, Pandur. The warp medic is something I have never encountered ingame. All I can say is put it down to a determined medic climbing, crawling, jumping, backflipping or cartwheeling if he had too to get to that injured guy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scipio Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 It is also unrealistic that your men keep sitting in a save and warm place, while their buddys are dying 5m away... I guess a sensefull reaction would be fire on the suspected enemy position. This would also keep your men away from giving buddy aid; IIRC only unsupressed squads/teams without fire or movement orders give buddy aid (but I could be wrong here). In other words, it's all your own fault. You men are not suppossed to sit around 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Joch Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Charles actually spent a lot of time tweaking the "buddy aid" behavior arround 1.10/1.11. We tested builds ranging from one extreme, where soldiers would totally ignore their comrades dying right next to them to the other extreme where they would ignore enemy soldiers firing on them to perform buddy aid. Under the current behavior, at least from the testing I saw, a soldier should not perform "buddy aid" if he is currently being fired at or under fire. The problem, of course, is that it is impossible to get the AI of the individual pixeltruppens to always behave as a real human would. The way it works now is obviously the compromise that BFC and most testers felt the most comfortable with, within the limitations of the AI. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita320106 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Instead of recoding the medic, I propose that wounded soldiers get sound effects, so we hear them cry for pain and their mothers, what they likely do in reality. if dev's do in this way, we all should must request another option for marines "kill enemy's wounded, 'cos no time for heal them ass" just kidding)) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Field Marshal Blücher Posted May 29, 2009 Author Share Posted May 29, 2009 Under the current behavior, at least from the testing I saw, a soldier should not perform "buddy aid" if he is currently being fired at or under fire. The problem, of course, is that it is impossible to get the AI of the individual pixeltruppens to always behave as a real human would. To clarify, he was not under fire when he ran out to medic the dude, but he was under fire in the same spot as the wounded guy under a minute earlier (and probably only 15 seconds or so earlier). He literally ran out as soon as he ceased to be suppressed. The way it works now is obviously the compromise that BFC and most testers felt the most comfortable with, within the limitations of the AI. I realize that, and I appreciate everyone's work! I just thought that I should point this out. I too agree that they should do something, but it should be more along the lines of "pull the guy into the building/down to your floor before medicing" rather than "rush blindly out into the kill zone to medic someone who's not even in your building." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Joch Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I should also point out that Steve has mentioned that CM:WW2 will feature a new way to treat casualties. I am as much in the dark about what that means as everyone else, but I presume this will affect how casualties, including "Buddy Aid" is handled in CM:WW2 and CMSF2. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scipio Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 To clarify, he was not under fire when he ran out to medic the dude, but he was under fire in the same spot as the wounded guy under a minute earlier (and probably only 15 seconds or so earlier). He literally ran out as soon as he ceased to be suppressed. The pixeltruppen doesn't remember obviosly what has happend to them in which spot. I assume the additional dataload the game would need to be able to handle this could be... a lot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wengart Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I've only had this happen to me while attempting to clear buildings, on occasion. The first guy in will get shot and everyone outside hits the deck. However one guy will rush in to provide buddy aid and gets shot too. Perhaps if the game could remember what happened to the last guy that attempted buddy aid the chain problem could be prevented, not that I have run into it. so If someone in a squad goes out to provide buddy aid, and gets shot the rest of the squad could use that info to choose not to give aid. But it seems to be a minor problem with the buddy aid system. So no need to completely change it around, I wouldn't think. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pvt. Ryan Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Buddy aid should only be administered if the wounded guy has a nice watch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clavicula_Nox Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Buddy aid should only be administered if the wounded guy has a nice watch. Or a picture of his girlfriend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkEzra Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Buddy aid should only be administered if the wounded guy has a nice watch. Or an I-Pod with good tunes... After all, this is a modern war setting 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meach Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 It's the chocolate ration I would be buddy aiding 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisND Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Or a picture of his girlfriend. But if he shows off a the picture during setup phase, he has to get nailed by a Syrian sniper. I'm pretty sure that is in the manual somewhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clavicula_Nox Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Lol. Too bad we can't have our pixel troopers stealing from each otherleft and right; otherwise we'd see humvees and trucks rolling down the street missing doors, and battalion staff-types missing batteries for NVGs and stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigduke6 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 I mean mostly the program makes squads stay more clumped up than they would likely to be in RL, plus since it's a sim ground is smoother and contains less tiny bits of man-sized cover, than RL. Plus the little pixel soldiers, unlike real ones, will keep doing their thing rather than hug the ground and/or hide when a tank points its main gun at them. PLUS (this last one I can't state as fact, but I suspect it) CMSF tank gunners don't miss very much. Net result: Single Tank HE shells erase half squads/crews routinely, and squads quite frequently. I find that inaccurate and I complain about it on these forums from time to time, as I do here. I don't really get what you mean about nerve gas but I agree that it's neat seeing the soldiers act like *people* who care about their comrades and will risk their person to try and help. It fits with how I imagine people acting in a battle, anyhow. I have no idea if it's accurate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Combatintman Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 What are we basing these opinions regarding medic behaviour on? If one of your blokes goes down you get him out - that's it - its what you do. He's one of your mates - somebody you went through training with, somebody you've been drinking with, somebody whose wedding you went to, somebody you'd do anything for, somebody you've spent the best years of your life with - in essence somebody who you have a closer bond with than anybody else in the world. Ask anybody who's been in the Army - you're not fighting for your country .... or victory points ... you're fighting for your mates. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.