MPK Posted April 4, 2005 Share Posted April 4, 2005 Recently came across this account, found it interesting...and horrible. "In December 1943 a German bomber flew over the Italian harbour of Bari and inflicted a good deal of damage to newly-arrived American stores destined for the use of Allied troops in Northern Europe." "Amongst the cargo was a top-secret consignment of mustard gas, ready for use against the German forces if they employed any against the Allies. Over 100 tons of the gas- filled shells were still in the hold of the SS John Harvey when the raid occurred." "Many of the shells (the exact number is uncertain) were damaged and their contents spread across the surface of the water in the dock,where sailors were swimming or hanging on to debris awaiting rescue after the raid. No-one noticed the damaged shells at first, and the thin traces of liquid floating on the water were not spotted by anyone in the confusion, although some sailors did notice 'a slight smell like garlic'. "Four or five hours later the first of the victims were dying. Within the next few days a total of eighty-three sailors lost their lives from pneumonia and lung damage caused by the gas, and some 540 were seriously ill as a result of their contact with the chemical..." [Ford, Brian J,(1971)'Allied Secret Weapons: the War of Science' Ballantine, Ney York] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 I don’t think any one can be on the moral high ground with this. Churchill approved testing / development of Anthrax is case SEALION actually happened. I’m sure that the Germans and Soviets also had supplies but I suspect that either through their own personal experience of their effects (Hitler) and the lack of any credible defence for their own troops for the inevitable counter strike, that no one wanted to employ them first. Besides for the Allies there was no need to resort to these options from ‘44 on as their conventional forces were more than adequate. The prospect of V1‘s and V2’s loaded with gas or nerve agent must have resulted in plenty of sleepless nights though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Originally posted by gibsonm: I’m sure that the Germans and Soviets also had supplies but I suspect that either through their own personal experience of their effects (Hitler) and the lack of any credible defence for their own troops for the inevitable counter strike, that no one wanted to employ them first.It wasn't only the troops who would have suffered. Air strategists before the war had contemplated the use of gas on civil populations as a way to quickly conclude a future war, and the British fully expected such a thing in 1940 could be unleashed against them. Those gasmasks you see British schoolchildren lugging around in old photographs weren't just for show. And even later during the mid-war period, Churchill raised the issue of using gas against the cities of Germany in a mass extermination campaign. This was not done, but the Allies were prepared to take that step had Hitler initiated the use of gas or biological weapons. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtMuhammed Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 The Allies would have been remiss not to at least have the threat of a response in kind to any chemical or bio attack. Both sides pretty much knew the other's capabilities. Giving away the innitiative could have lead to dissaster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 Deja vu all over again. Sounds like the first Gulf War. I believe a recent Brit study concluded that much of 'Gulf War Syndrome' was due to trace amounts of nerve gas released by the U.S. blowing up Iraqi ammo dumps. That conclusion automatically bumped Allied casualties for the first Gulf War from hundreds to hundreds of thousands. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPK Posted April 9, 2005 Author Share Posted April 9, 2005 I've always found it interesting that Napalm is considered a Chemical Weapon, and tends to be considered as such when Treaties deciding what is and isn't 'acceptable' are drawn up...eg the Geneva Convention... Ditto WP (white phosphorus)... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPK Posted April 9, 2005 Author Share Posted April 9, 2005 BTW, the bit I thought was 'horrible' was not that the Good Guys had poison gas but that the sailors (merchant seamen) in the water copped it hard. Gas wasn't used, not because it is less humane than immolating people in firestorms or irradiating them in vast numbers, but because it has limited application... I would expect the next generation of war chemicals to be far more specific and deadly...and more 'useable'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radetzky Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 a german scientist working for the ig farben discovered sarin as early as 1938, a nerve toxic gas. some of you might know it for being used by some japanese terrorists in the tokyo underground in 1995. the germans started to produce nerve gas (called "tabun" and "sarin")in the spring of '42 in considerably amounts and made all necessary preparations to use them against the allies. by the end of '44 the germans had about 12.000 tons of tabun ready in bombs and grenades. but they believed in the allies having comparable stocks of nerve gas (they didn't even know about it until they discovered the factories and arsenals) and so never used it - thank the lord for that. anyone interested in the subject should take a look at "a higher form of killing" by robert harris / jeremy paxman (arrow books 2002) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPK Posted April 10, 2005 Author Share Posted April 10, 2005 Sarin began life as an insecticide... The bug sprays of today that are 'anti-cholinesterase' in action are for all intents and purposes simply Sarin...diluted. Next time you see cockroaches doing the Dance Of Death after being sprayed, realize you have just used a nerve agent...but then we have the Moral High Ground, don't we? Those bugs were WARNED. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Originally posted by MPK: Those bugs were WARNED. True. Every time I flush one down the toilet, I remind them that they were welcome to a long and prosperous life as long as they (a) never came inside my house, and ( never touched my sacred body. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPK Posted April 11, 2005 Author Share Posted April 11, 2005 "True. Every time I flush one down the toilet, I remind them that they were welcome to a long and prosperous life as long as they (a) never came inside my house, and ( never touched my sacred body." Was this a VERBAL contract? -You really want to nail it down in this situation, especially if drowning is your preferred method... -I was careful to post a written 14 Day Notice To Quit on the fridge before using the Sarinade Cocktail...this makes it legal, say my legal people. -Some of them W.A insects are large & audacious, and may require rougher handling... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Show them no mercy. There are more of them than there are of us. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonS Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Yes, but Michael, there are more of you skittering around than I'm entirely comfortable with. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPK Posted April 11, 2005 Author Share Posted April 11, 2005 "Show them no mercy" You need to be a little bit selective with genocide...be careful not to harm any spiders...what one spider knows, they all know...they communicate, you see, by using that World Wide Web thingy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Originally posted by JonS: Yes, but Michael, there are more of you skittering around than I'm entirely comfortable with. You should talk. Two in your brood and counting, right? :eek: Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.