Ales Dvorak Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Elvis just left the building. Does he ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUSSIEJEFF Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Joe Shaw: Right then lads, I've another proposal to be added to the rules, comment appreciated: {XVi.34/^}: No SSN or SK shall be afforded any consideration until or unless they shall have a general location in their profile. The general location is critical as well. They might be Australian and we CERTAINLY don't want any more of THAT TYPE! This proposed addition to the rules can be phrased as wished, but I think it might be helpful in screening the riff-raff and trolls like Donkey-a-thon. Joe<hr></blockquote> Hmmm, So where exactly does THAT leave Bauwhos prithee oh Just-a-chariot? I see no GENERAL ADDRESS in HIS profile either ..... (PS: "Special" Xmas cheers to Herr Oberst for forwarding the fix for that rotten keyboard virus he accidently sent me prior.... AWL is well now, you will be glad to cheer...) And for god's sake Seanachai, can't you spot a challenge when you SEE one??? My last post CLEARLY elucidated such ........ I am sure the honorable SP NOBA (Serf Pending) could dispatch a faer setup twixt both our armies post hasty. What say you to THAT, you, you..... SelfproposedOrziescrunchingSquib. AJ [Edited for the simple pleasure of it.....] [ 12-21-2001: Message edited by: AussieJeff ]</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by AussieJeff: Hmmm, So where exactly does THAT leave Bauwhos prithee oh Just-a-chariot? I see no GENERAL ADDRESS in HIS profile either .....<hr></blockquote> You might ALSO note then, that he's not a bloody, useless, whining, illiterate and witless SSN! Mind all the words except for SSN apply but he's no SSN and therefore exempt from the ruling. Now SOD OFF again! <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>And for god's sake Seanachai, can't you spot a challenge when you SEE one??? My last post CLEARLY elucidated such ........ I am sure the honorable SP NOBA (Serf Pending) could dispatch a faer setup twixt both our armies post hasty. What say you to THAT, you, you..... SelfproposedOrziescrunchingsquib. AJ<hr></blockquote>Don't you EVER read the rules you ignorant pillock? SSNs should never expect a Knight, let alone a Seniour Knight, let alone an Olde One to listen to their pathetic whining mewls for a game! Now SOD OFF! Did you forget your earlier encounter with us? SOD OFF while you can lad or you'll be the second to be Sent to Coventry! SOD OFF! Joe [ 12-21-2001: Message edited by: Joe Shaw ]</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iskander Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 reeling with Manhattan in hand... dammit there, Mr. Sphnctr that really is something other that else... had to post the whole bleary thing on my blogspot! Now: off to see what really happend with that bunghole Seanachai; expect report immediately. Or shortly. Whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Humbug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iskander Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 BTS! PLS FX R DO SUMFINK!! Allow me, not to get this straight, but get this Pooled: I have 204 OK; Seanachai has 43. I have 57 KIA; Seanachai has 108. AND THIS IS A FECKING DRAW?!? Given that it's the Xmas season, I'd like to take this result to hang some mistletoe over my ass and invite you all over. sheesh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGMB Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Soldiers, CHEF Get me a turn so that I can get around to killing you! PENG Burn baby.... thought I'd buy all Tigers? Hehe.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Iskander: BTS! PLS FX R DO SUMFINK!! Allow me, not to get this straight, but get this Pooled: I have 204 OK; Seanachai has 43. I have 57 KIA; Seanachai has 108. AND THIS IS A FECKING DRAW?!? Given that it's the Xmas season, I'd like to take this result to hang some mistletoe over my ass and invite you all over. sheesh!<hr></blockquote>Now what kind of an example is that to set for the swarms of SSNs that are hanging around these days? You might want to DO A FECKING SEARCH on VLs, Victory Conditions in various situations and WHINING ABOUT A LOSS LIKE A FECKING BABY ... you make me sick. How was the taunting? THAT'S the important question you geek. Who won THAT battle? Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauhaus Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Joe Shaw: Don't you EVER read the rules you ignorant pillock? SSNs should never expect a Knight, let alone a Seniour Knight, let alone an Olde One to listen to their pathetic whining mewls for a game! Now SOD OFF! Did you forget your earlier encounter with us? SOD OFF while you can lad or you'll be the second to be Sent to Coventry! SOD OFF! <hr></blockquote> Alright you giant build up of flatulance. While I appreciate the defense and the truth that you tell, I feel it's time to get your butt in gear and get me that battle byte that you challenged me to decades ago. Here let me taunt ye the way the SUPs are accustomed to.....are you yellow? Your mother wears army boots (though we all know it's really your mormon wives) Now get your mormon wife underwear sniffing, hampster humping, gnome licking ass in gear and get me the set up. And Flossy, those in the know, understand I am also a Heraldite and the useless group that we are reside in the Windiest of all Cities. Do not ever ever question a Senior Knight's status. That is reserved for the vile members of the pool. I hate you all.....piss off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Bauhaus if you had any sense at all you'd retract that challenge. Have you forgotten, already, how my tactical acumen (ACUMEN damnit, it means capability ... I don't care WHAT it sounds like it's not that ... no, I'm quite sure) ... sheesh. Anyway you must have forgotten that my battle hardened (oh for the love of Pete, it's BATTLE hardened you Ozzie goof), troops walked over the quivering ... no, no, that's fine, quivering yes, absolutely what I was referring to, right you are. {sigh} ... setup on the way. No, no carry on by all means, I'll just wander off down the way here ... Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Iskander: BTS! PLS FX R DO SUMFINK!! Allow me, not to get this straight, but get this Pooled: I have 204 OK; Seanachai has 43. I have 57 KIA; Seanachai has 108. AND THIS IS A FECKING DRAW?!? Given that it's the Xmas season, I'd like to take this result to hang some mistletoe over my ass and invite you all over. sheesh!<hr></blockquote> That's what happens when you play gamey bast.... , er, Olde Ones. You'll get used to it. I have clearly thumped Seanachai on more than one occasion only to have the score go quite the other way. When/if you get to Olde One status you'll understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noba Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Oh, Jo snore: Your reply to AJ...... __________________________________________________ Don't you EVER read the rules you ignorant pillock? SSNs should never expect a Knight, let alone a Seniour Knight, let alone an Olde One to listen to their pathetic whining mewls for a game! Now SOD OFF! __________________________________________________ You forget. Seanachai listened to this THIS SSN;(Australian - OF COURSE)...when I reported to the pool after ME telling him to SOD OFF! in the Aussie thread. The mere fact that when I dutifully arrived, (At that point I thought it correct to do the right thing to protect Aussies) the EX-Mighty one actually listened and replied. It makes light of your statement. So your useless dribble of a reply to AJ means bugger all. I remind one and all in this pox ridden den of senile old ones .... SEANACHAI IS LOSING TO ALL AUSTRALIANS HE IS PLAYING. Not one of you is good enough to stand up to an Australian, not even with rigged scenarios. You are all hiding behind the 'Abuse someone in particular' "rule". With the end of Seanachai, who will be the next loser ... ? Hanns, are you up to losing a fair fight ? You can't post anything other than dribble, you spend all your time whining and foraging around in the 'pool. It's about time you found out if your backbone exists, other than in your mind that is ! Send me a set up. Or SOD OFF ! Noba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawyer Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Noba: SEANACHAI IS LOSING TO ALL AUSTRALIANS HE IS PLAYING. <hr></blockquote> It is impossible under the Laws of Nature to "lose" to an Australian, just as it is impossible to WIN against a lawyer. How can one lose to ultimate losers who are called "downunder" for very clear and logical reasons? Seanachai is an English-Victorian-Wannabee who buys Queen Elizabeth Jubilee plates on E-Bay, but even he cannot lose to an Australian, no matter what the score is in CM. His weekend Oscar Wilde dress-ups can't change nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Originally posted by Lawyer: [QB] It is impossible under the Laws of Nature to "lose" to an Australian, just as it is impossible to WIN against a lawyer. How can one lose to ultimate losers who are called "downunder" for very clear and logical reasons? You, sir, are very clearly delusional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noba Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Moriarty: Originally posted by Lawyer: [QB] _______________________________________________________ It is impossible under the Laws of Nature to "lose" to an Australian, just as it is impossible to WIN against a lawyer. How can one lose to ultimate losers who are called "downunder" for very clear and logical reasons? _______________________________________________________ You, sir, are very clearly delusional.<hr></blockquote> A veritable champions reply. Perhaps the 'pools lick-spittle would care to back up his post (where he gets one out of three bits right. I have to agree about WINNING against Lawyers, only in real life though....) Come to think of it...Lawyers don't live in the real world at all. They are not part of the 'Laws of Nature' either. Nothing that obscene can be attributed to anything 'Natural'. I did read that Australians may have become the most litigious country / per capita in the world, so maybe we could welcome you as an honary Aussie. Make sure you arrive by boat ! Cyclone season ! Of course, we will give you a holiday somewhere in the South Pacific first. (As befits someone of your standing). Noba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roborat Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Greetings and best wishes for the holiday season from the depths of northern Canada (redundant statement, I know) on the longest night of the year. Congrats MrSpkr, that has to be, without a doubt, the most inspired and artistic posting of the rules I have ever seen. It, alone, made wading through the last four incarnations of the mbt worthwhile. Kudos to you (looks in pocket) here's three, it's all I have. Hiram, it's good to have you back, and Croda, you (almost) replace the venom and vitriol of the awol Meeks, a quality sorely missing from the 'pool lately. For what it's worth, my inclination is to punt the rusty fryguy. I apparently have more tolerance than most, must come from being in nearly constant state of hypothermia, but even I cannot take it anymore, he takes annoying into heretofore uncharted and frightening dimensions. For game updates Lleeoo and I are still battling it out, my strategy is to keep giving him targets until his tanks run out of ammo, so far, so good. Also gave him a nasty surprise in the far right corner, where the edge hugging gamey bugger discovered what a simultanous armour ambush and artillery barrage can do to some unescorted armoured cars and tracks trapped in some woods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeknodathon Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Berlichtingen: What part of SINGLE SOMEONE OUT don't you understand? Lord love a duck, but the latest batch of SSNs are none to bright<hr></blockquote> ...ooohhhhh, right... with you now.... okay, okay... ahem (cough) er, just a small, tiny, minor point: "SINGLE SOMEONE OUT" Errrrrr, Homo Sapien? Bit optimistic here! Okay, lets broaden the net.... humanoid? Errrrr, nope, nope don't see anyone upright on two legs.... okay, raise yer paw if you CLAIM to be a mammal.... dodgy... 1, 2, oh, that one's doubtful.... oh, yes, I see, unnatural breeding... count you as 1/2 then.... got some reptilian crawlers, even got a marsupial... that count? BurpLactating, where'd you feature in this evolutionary freak show? Yeknod [ 12-22-2001: Message edited by: Yeknodathon ]</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Noba: A veritable champions reply. Perhaps the 'pools lick-spittle would care to back up his post (where he gets one out of three bits right. I have to agree about WINNING against Lawyers, only in real life though....) Noba.<hr></blockquote> See me when you're a Kanigget, boy-o. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpkr Posted December 22, 2001 Author Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Iskander: reeling with Manhattan in hand... dammit there, Mr. Sphnctr that really is something other that else... had to post the whole bleary thing on my blogspot!<hr></blockquote> And no bloody credit for me, either, I see. Where's jdmorse when you really need him? Wanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goanna Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Jo Xia: On a side note, I think that young Donkey-a-thon is a Nog TOO and note that HE hasn't challenged anyone EITHER but has merely posted tripe in large quantities.<hr></blockquote> True, but he did bring a sing-song and you know how that often attracts the favour of the Bard. He also apparently has a grasp of the English language, grammar and punctuation which is more than can be said for some. The fact that his points are completely incomprehensible is not, in itself, a reason to cast him out yet, as where would that have left those such as PawBroon? <blockquote>quote:</font><hr> mrsqkr: BTW, if I left any of you maggots out of this outstanding bit of poetry, it's probably because I find you less interesting than watching grass grow or paint dry.<hr></blockquote> I knew there had to be a reason. It’s either this or the fact that you can’t even bear to type the names of those of us who are thrashing you like a rug on a line just before company arrives. <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>More-arty: See me when you're a Kanigget, boy-o.<hr></blockquote> Technically speaking I do beleive he was calling the consigliori out. But thanks for sticking up for your mates in Australia. Me thinks it must be getting pretty cold in deep southern Wisconsin and you are looking for an offer of safe refuge in warmer climes until spring. Perhaps the Herald should do an in-depth study of rural bushfire brigades that they could find someone of experience to cover. Oh, and be sure to bring along a photograhper. [ 12-22-2001: Message edited by: Goanna ]</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Your reply to AJ...... __________________________________________________ Don't you EVER read the rules you ignorant pillock? SSNs should never expect a Knight, let alone a Seniour Knight, let alone an Olde One to listen to their pathetic whining mewls for a game! Now SOD OFF! __________________________________________________ You forget. Seanachai listened to this THIS SSN;(Australian - OF COURSE)...when I reported to the pool after ME telling him to SOD OFF! in the Aussie thread. The mere fact that when I dutifully arrived, (At that point I thought it correct to do the right thing to protect Aussies) the EX-Mighty one actually listened and replied. It makes light of your statement. So your useless dribble of a reply to AJ means bugger all.<hr></blockquote> First, learn UBB ... it is your friend. Second, what part of "SSNs should never expect ... an Olde One to listen to their pathetic whining mewls for a game !" did you miss? OH, well it's obvious isn't it? The operative phrase was "for a game" ... yes well that makes it all different doesn't it? Responding is one thing, responding to a demand for a game ... entirely another. I'll give you this, Knobber, you show more promise than all three of the more recent SSNs put together ... damning with faint praise to be sure but still one should take what one can get. Surprised that's not on the Australian flag, convict ancestry and all. Joe [ 12-22-2001: Message edited by: Joe Shaw ]</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGSF Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Ay may bae simply cos o' tha fetid shoe stains tha' ha' bin wanderin' ain here o' late as SSN's, bu' Ah still think tha BackedOopOnADonkey show's tha slightest promise. Alreet, perrhaps "slightest" as a wee bat strong. Anyhoo, he did try tae taunt someone hais ain level, low an' scum suckin' tha at as, but tha's precious few SSNs' an' squires tae bae foond right noo. Tha follow oop were a disappointment tho. Here's a haids oop fer ye FullO'DonkeyBoy - put ye email address ain ye stankin' profile laddie. Otherwise ye a skankin' Persona Non Gratis an' tha' can bae a very peculiar thang, as anyone wi' an ounce o' 'Pool tradition wid knoo. Tha AussieJeff as gi' tha acumen o' a cod fish fart - wha' didnye challenge tha' twit? An' mak at a guid wun, laddie. Sound off lak ye go' a pair, an' noo aboot thaim. SirMacOberGruppenBloodyStompinSicFeuhrerBastardABCDJimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanachai Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by dalem: MrSpkr I am forced to agree with the rest of the tripe in here - your lyricizing was perfect. <hr></blockquote> Parts of it, actually, were vile bad. 'Strodinarily bad stuff. But other parts, other parts, mind you, well, they were quite good. And on the whole, on the whole, that is, it was amusing. Even very amusing. Sometime we'll have to have to have a 'Pool tournament. Oh, not about silly ****e like winning and losing at CM, we aren't about that after all, as we are all just lovers of the game, and here in the Peng Challenge Thread, we are all about playing the game, while useless pillocks stress out daily on whether they're winning the Mother Beautiful Game. And, of course, these pillocks whose manhood is totally wound up with whether they are winning Combat Mission, are the same ones who make up a huge percentage of the whimpering, whinging, and disappointed children who wail on about 'mismodeled this' and 'unrealistic that'. The rest who carry on about that sort of thing, of course, are Grogs, and they're only doing their job. No, we should have a proper, Peng Challenge Thread sort of Tournament. One involving the most finely turned insult, or the best parody of a literary work or song sort of thing. It is in this that the true spirit of the Peng Challenge Thread will be found. MrSpkr, well done, you loathsome, spotty little dog's dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanns Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 Arguing with Ozztralians is like competing in the Special Olympics. You may be the winner but you're still a retard. What's that Nobber? You challenging me you little pissant? I have put a good BOOTing to your mate SpazzyJeff in a real battle. Such a bad beating I might add that he requested a ceasefire. Bwaaaa..... I shall find a nice little battle on "Der Kessel" after I get home from the bar and proceed to kick you crooked, yellowed, mangy teeth in. Something short and brutish I would think. Prepare a will, check it twice cuz death is coming tonight. Git! Hanns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted December 22, 2001 Share Posted December 22, 2001 <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Goanna: Technically speaking I do beleive he was calling the consigliori out. But thanks for sticking up for your mates in Australia. Me thinks it must be getting pretty cold in deep southern Wisconsin and you are looking for an offer of safe refuge in warmer climes until spring. Perhaps the Herald should do an in-depth study of rural bushfire brigades that they could find someone of experience to cover. Oh, and be sure to bring along a photograhper. [ 12-22-2001: Message edited by: Goanna ]<hr></blockquote> You speak Oz better'n me. I wasn't quite sure who he was callin' out. As for a trip way south, I'd love it but the firm won't go for it. Did you get my setup? It came back once from your bigpond addy ... something about lots of messages ... but I thought it went through later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts