Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
AlexB

Last patch

Recommended Posts

Did the last patch break the game to where it is not playable, my troops receive fire while behind cover and immediately run toward the enemy in the open...………...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

Sadly, I've yet to any evidence of it being fixed.

There was a whole thread about it. So, I won't rehash that here.

There is a still an issue with a specific type of bocage that will show this behavior.  Of the 6 games that means that only CMBN is affected and, in that,  only with that bocage. Other than that it is gone with the 4.02 patch. So, make sure that you have that patch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, BFCElvis said:

There was a whole thread about it. So, I won't rehash that here.

There is a still an issue with a specific type of bocage that will show this behavior.  Of the 6 games that means that only CMBN is affected and, in that,  only with that bocage. Other than that it is gone with the 4.02 patch. So, make sure that you have that patch.

Give over, Declan. You know full well that I am aware of the fact that "There was a whole thread about it", and that I have the 4.02 patch, I've commented on it often enough.  And you also know that my comment was specifically about CMBN, and that that is what we need fixing. You are beginning to sound like a member of Johnny Underpants last cabinet (obscure Limey political reference for our USAtian readers). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang you couple hundred year old brits are touchy.   2 items. A general issue in all titles that needed to be fixed and a secondary issue with hedgerows in CMBN.  One is done, the other is acknowledged. There is a bit of other stuff going on like CMFI and CMRT so just maybe calling the one guy who has been doing a great job lately in providing updates Johnny underpants isn’t the best way to reward the effort to be more communicative.   Unless you’d prefer BF to just go back to the old method. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Erm.

1. I'm not a "brit", I'm a Limey.

2. I didn't call Declan "Johnny Underpants", I said that he was beginning to sound like a member of that person's cabinet.

3. My comment in post no.4 was an honest reply to the OP and post no. 2.

4. I have never once complained about how BFC communicate with us, and was quite happy with "the old method". In fact my support for how BFC do things got me labelled a "fanboi" on more than one occasion.

Edited by Warts 'n' all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

Give over, Declan. You know full well that I am aware of the fact that "There was a whole thread about it", and that I have the 4.02 patch, I've commented on it often enough.  And you also know that my comment was specifically about CMBN, and that that is what we need fixing. You are beginning to sound like a member of Johnny Underpants last cabinet (obscure Limey political reference for our USAtian readers). 

I didn't direct that 4.02 advise to you. I was directing it to the original poster @AlexB I suppose I should have been more specific but it does actually apply to anyone that installed 4.01 and not 4.02 yet.

I quoted you because, contrary to what you say, there is tons and tons and tons and tons of evidence that the issue was addressed. You continuing to falsely repeating that it hasn't changed doesn't change that. Repeating the same misinformation over and over won't make it true.

Now, I'm gonna go watch Shane Lowery with The Open Championship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, BFCElvis said:

I quoted you because, contrary to what you say, there is tons and tons and tons and tons of evidence that the issue was addressed. You continuing to falsely repeating that it hasn't changed doesn't change that. Repeating the same misinformation over and over won't make it true.

Now, I'm gonna go watch Shane Lowery with The Open Championship.

I have never said that the problem has not been worked on, or addressed. What I have said is that with regards to CMBN it has not been "fixed", i.e. people are still running into the problem when they have 4.02 installed. So that either means that 4.02 didn't fix the gap charging problem. Or, that a number of us have made a mistake when installing 4.02 that we are unaware of.

Therefore may I suggest that you, or someone else, provide some screenshots of 4.02 in action working properly in CMBN especially with regards to the campaigns that people have reported having problems with e.g. Montebourg, The Scottish Corridor, and Niijmegen. I think also a shot of how the CMBN folder should look post a successful installation of 4.02 would be very helpful.

In the meantime despite Granddad Fitz being a Meathman,  I am off to the telly to cheer on the boy from across the Offaly border.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Warts 'n' all said:

I have never said that the problem has not been worked on, or addressed. What I have said is that with regards to CMBN it has not been "fixed", i.e. people are still running into the problem when they have 4.02 installed. So that either means that 4.02 didn't fix the gap charging problem.

Correct, this is the hedgerow behavior that has been specified and only shows in CMBN. It is being looked at.  Limey fanboi. Or should I say old limey fanboi?  Did they call them limeys back then?  Would it have e been fanboyo versus fanboi?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, sburke said:

Did they call them limeys back then? 

it was probably just a tad after my time, old chap. But, we have always dealt with cries of "Fanboi" in the time honoured fashion....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Warts 'n' all said:

it was probably just a tad after my time, old chap. But, we have always dealt with cries of "Fanboi" in the time honoured fashion....

Amazing how you adapt to all the new kid expressions over the years.  Like the cool uncle in the family. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Warts 'n' all said:

I have never said that the problem has not been worked on, or addressed. What I have said is that with regards to CMBN it has not been "fixed", i.e. people are still running into the problem when they have 4.02 installed. So that either means that 4.02 didn't fix the gap charging problem. Or, that a number of us have made a mistake when installing 4.02 that we are unaware of.

UUmmm....No, that is not even close to what to you said. I'll quote the OP and your reply to remind you......

 

Quote

Did the last patch break the game to where it is not playable, my troops receive fire while behind cover and immediately run toward the enemy in the open...………...

Quote

Sadly, I've yet to any evidence of it being fixed.

As you can see....there was no mention of CMBN, hedgerows,, gaps in hedgerows or that you have seen seen signs that it had changed from 4.01 to 4.02. As a matter of fact your response is the polar opposite  having said "I have never said that the problem has not been worked on, or addressed.". You may not even be aware that in all of the games breaking infantry was running out of all manner of cover (buildings, foxholes, trees, you name it) and running toward fire. That behavior has 100% been fixed...whether you have seen evidence of it or not....with the exception of 1 game (CMBN) and 1 specific type of cover in that single game (I forget offhand whether it was low hedgerows or high hedgerows but one of them....not both) , period.

 

Lowery is still up by 5 after a shaky first hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, sburke said:

Amazing how you adapt to all the new kid expressions over the years.  Like the cool uncle in the family. 

Hahahahaha. I'll have to tell that one to my nephews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, BFCElvis said:

UUmmm....No, that is not even close to what to you said. I'll quote the OP and your reply to remind you......

 

As you can see....there was no mention of CMBN, hedgerows,, gaps in hedgerows or that you have seen seen signs that it had changed from 4.01 to 4.02. As a matter of fact your response is the polar opposite  having said "I have never said that the problem has not been worked on, or addressed.". You may not even be aware that in all of the games breaking infantry was running out of all manner of cover (buildings, foxholes, trees, you name it) and running toward fire. That behavior has 100% been fixed...whether you have seen evidence of it or not....with the exception of 1 game (CMBN) and 1 specific type of cover in that single game (I forget offhand whether it was low hedgerows or high hedgerows but one of them....not both) , period.

 

Lowery is still up by 5 after a shaky first hole.

I'm sorry, but this is getting daft. Given the fact that you know full well that all of my comments about this problem have only ever applied to the gap charging problem in CMBN I find your comments over the last week or so confusing, at best, if not downright disingenuous. And I would prefer it if you add me to you ignore list, at least that way I will no longer have to suffer your blatant misinterpretations of my posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

I'm sorry, but this is getting daft. Given the fact that you know full well that all of my comments about this problem have only ever applied to the gap charging problem in CMBN I find your comments over the last week or so confusing, at best, if not downright disingenuous. And I would prefer it if you add me to you ignore list, at least that way I will no longer have to suffer your blatant misinterpretations of my posts.

You're missing the point, mate. I am aware of your comments on the subject. But it is a safe assumption that the original poster is not.They are the one asking the question. If they were familiar with your comments in another thread they would not have started this one asking about. Make sense? I am not sure why you think that the original poster was familiar with your remarks. That is what prompted me to correct the record after your comment. 

I don't have anybody on my ignore list and I can't imagine a scenario where I would. It is in my job description to set the record straight when people (intentionally or unintentionally) misrepresent aspects of the game. Additionally, how did I misrepresent your post? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...