Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Childress

Hitler, the failed artist

Recommended Posts

And to put things in context, while the Versailles Treaty was unfair let's remember what the Germans did when they were the victor.   The Germans had, the year before, forced Russia's new Bolshevik gov't into a much worse treaty than Versailles.  It was called the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and when Germans complained about the terms the French and British were pushing, the allies replied that it was less harsh than what the Germans had recently done to the Russians.  So when the Germans cried of the terrible unfairness and punitive nature of Versailles, they were pleasantly ignoring that they more greedy & punitive than the allies in treaty negotiations with fallen foes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, danfrodo said:

And to put things in context, while the Versailles Treaty was unfair let's remember what the Germans did when they were the victor.   The Germans had, the year before, forced Russia's new Bolshevik gov't into a much worse treaty than Versailles.  It was called the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and when Germans complained about the terms the French and British were pushing, the allies replied that it was less harsh than what the Germans had recently done to the Russians.  So when the Germans cried of the terrible unfairness and punitive nature of Versailles, they were pleasantly ignoring that they more greedy & punitive than the allies in treaty negotiations with fallen foes.

what context please!? You´re just about to open another can of worms. I´ve just deleted what I´d liked to reply here and I better leave it this way. But keep your short sighted discussion going. I step out here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The context was that many Germans felt justified in starting wars because they were treated unfairly (true, they were).  But they really had no morale high ground, no right to play the victim, because that they showed worse behavior to a fallen Russia the previous year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danfrodo said:

The context was that many Germans felt justified in starting wars because they were treated unfairly (true, they were).  But they really had no morale high ground, no right to play the victim, because that they showed worse behavior to a fallen Russia the previous year. 

yeah... the germans, the russians, the good and the evil, the black and the white. Maybe there´s bits more behind that, but what I´d said....stepping out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, please understand me.  I was not saying it was black and white.  I was saying it was all grey and complicated.  My statement wasn't about good guys and bad guys.  It's about perception.  Folks feel persecuted, rightfully.  And these same people then persecute others.  And on and on.  It's not a 'german' thing, it's a human thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, danfrodo said:

Folks feel persecuted, rightfully.  And these same people then persecute others.

At some point, somebody needs to grow a pair and break that cycle.....'I had a bad time' is not an excuse for giving one to others.  :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

At some point, somebody needs to grow a pair and break that cycle.....'I had a bad time' is not an excuse for giving one to others.  :mellow:

You are entirely correct IMO. But apparently it will require the hard decision to go to genetic alteration to get us there, and there is bound to be somebody who believes it to be in his/her interest to sabotage the process.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Childress,

What an informative post! I agree with DerKommissar that Hitler's art was certainly good enough to rate admission to the art school. Indeed, what I've seen of his art is much better, in my view, than lots of stuff I've seen in museums that allegedly is art. Am certainly in the multitude wishing he'd gotten to go to art school and that Stalin had become a Pushkin or similar. Did Mao have stymied artistic aspirations, too?

Returning to Stalin, the more I watch Russian movies about the GPW and read about him and his generals, the more impressed I am about Stalin's real mastery (as opposed to Hitler's pseudo-mastery) of running a gigantic war effort in an almost intimate way. What I've seen of his message traffic is fascinating.  He was a super man in terms of hard work, routinely keeping extraordinary hours so grueling I can recall reading he killed three generals from overwork. Believe his handling of the war, admittedly imperfect at times, was still astonishing for someone who, to my knowledge, had never  been a soldier or a street fighter. From what I recall, Stalin was first a criminal (a thief, I believe), an agent for the Tsar's secret police (maybe a double serving it and the opposition to the Tsar), then got entrenched in the upper echelons of the Bolshevik party. This is probably incomplete, but my main point is someone with no paramilitary or military experience was running a war, war production, logistics, etc. on a scale far greater than was Hitler, and overall doing it well, not to mention accomplishing a whole series of geo-strategic successes too.

Regards,
 

John Kettler 

 

Edited by John Kettler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Hitler had a passion and technical skills for drawing buildings. But you can't really get into art school if that's basically all you want to draw, there's more to it than that. Art is something that is used to transmit emotions or otherwise some kind of meaning, and Hitler's disinterest in that pretty much sealed his fate.

Edited by Frenchy56

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Frenchy56 said:

Art is something that is used to transmit emotions or otherwise some kind of meaning

Not I imagine then for art school - entrance to them was from demonstrating some form of eye hand drawing ability - and this was honed by life drawing , first from plaster casts and then life drawing in the classical tradition. There was in acedemia / pre-camera a heirarchy for artists where the best emarked on careers as Figural / portraitists, then lower down Landscapes, then the lowly Still Life artists.

image.png.ce70298e682bdba11e1a9f1da2a99dbb.png

Things now are a bit more flexible - Hitlers work reminds me of when I first attended life drawing at an One year Arts Foundation Course  (pre Uni) following A' Levels and I was seated next to an aspiring industrial designer - and he produced a wonderfuly drawn picture of the room inc plumbing/ radiators etc all in perfect perspective but where the nude model was meant to be was just a blank untouched silhouetted outline.   

Here's what the precociously talented Picasso (b. 1881) and Dal (b. 1904) i were doing in their early teens.

https://mymodernmet.com/picasso-early-work/

https://www.wikiart.org/en/salvador-dali/all-works#!#filterName:Period_early-years-1917-1927,resultType:masonry

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...