Jump to content
John Kettler

More drama in Ukraine--Sea of Azov

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, DerKommissar said:

Yeah, even more reason it's strange that USMC, Ukranian Marines and VMF don't appear in Black SEA.

?? there is only so much space in a release. More to come and all that... Didn't Steve even hint that the plan for the BS module would include Marines? It has been a while so I could be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, IanL said:

Didn't Steve even hint that the plan for the BS module would include Marines? It has been a while so I could be wrong.

I could be wrong too, but I think I remember the same thing.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah they specifically said they planned to have USMC and VDV, ISTR Russian marines as well.  It was also said that they wanted to add irregular forces for both ukrainian sides later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall years (decades) ago the Pentagon did a big wargame sim to test out their newest warfighting theories and futuristic weapon designs. Unfortunately the opponent team was too aggressive and managed to sink their landing craft just as the sim got going. The frustrated development team called a halt to the wargame, refloated their landing craft, and resumed the sim. I don't believe the things fared much better on land. The clever opponent team was able to saturate and overwhelm the Blue side's high tech defenses. The exercise foretold the current problem of using expensive patriot missiles to shoot down cheap drones. I wish I could remember when that wargame took place, perhaps the late 90s of early 20s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IanL said:

?? there is only so much space in a release. More to come and all that... Didn't Steve even hint that the plan for the BS module would include Marines? It has been a while so I could be wrong.

 

3 hours ago, Michael Emrys said:

I could be wrong too, but I think I remember the same thing.

Michael

 

1 hour ago, Sublime said:

Yeah they specifically said they planned to have USMC and VDV, ISTR Russian marines as well.  It was also said that they wanted to add irregular forces for both ukrainian sides later.

In October 2017, in the thread Another Reason for a Centralized Forum, Steve said,

CMBS is owed a Module.  CMBS is theoretically next after CMRT.  Marines are an obvious selection for the first Module and the work being done for CMSF2 is going to pave the way for that to happen.

In June 2018, in the thread CMRT Module 1 Bones, Steve said,

Partisans could be introduced in Pack form to CMBN, CMFI, or CMRT.

I want to say Steve said uncons could be released for CMBS but have not found that yet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MikeyD said:

I recall years (decades) ago the Pentagon did a big wargame sim to test out their newest warfighting theories and futuristic weapon designs. Unfortunately the opponent team was too aggressive and managed to sink their landing craft just as the sim got going. The frustrated development team called a halt to the wargame, refloated their landing craft, and resumed the sim. I don't believe the things fared much better on land. The clever opponent team was able to saturate and overwhelm the Blue side's high tech defenses. The exercise foretold the current problem of using expensive patriot missiles to shoot down cheap drones. I wish I could remember when that wargame took place, perhaps the late 90s of early 20s.

That was Millennium Challenge 2002. The OPFOR was led by retired Marine Corps Lt Gen Paul Van Riper. https://warontherocks.com/2015/11/millennium-challenge-the-real-story-of-a-corrupted-military-exercise-and-its-legacy/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DerKommissar said:

Yeah, even more reason it's strange that USMC, Ukranian Marines and VMF don't appear in Black SEA.

They didn't make it into SF off the bat either. Black Sea had quite a lot of content for a title release: 85 vehicles (US 25, RUS 40, UKR 20) and 91 on map formations (US 27, RUS 33, UKR 31). Shock Force had 49 vehicles (US 25, SYR 24) and 43 on map formations (US 11, SYR 32).  I'd say BS was chock full.

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I don’t recall Steve ever committing to uncons for CMBS.  The problem is interpreting current events against BF scenarios. It is something that keeps coming up regarding Syria and CMSF as well. CMBS was never intended to be the hybrid warfare model of the current situation, it was more a full on invasion of Ukraine. If you read the back story in the manual they explicitly state what it is they are portraying in the game or not and the uncon forces and situation in the Donbass is not part of the game portrayal.  That being said it is always possible they could revisit that in a pack. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, MOS:96B2P said:

In October 2017, in the thread Another Reason for a Centralized Forum, Steve said,

CMBS is owed a Module.  CMBS is theoretically next after CMRT.  Marines are an obvious selection for the first Module and the work being done for CMSF2 is going to pave the way for that to happen.

In June 2018, in the thread CMRT Module 1 Bones, Steve said,

Partisans could be introduced in Pack form to CMBN, CMFI, or CMRT.

I want to say Steve said uncons could be released for CMBS but have not found that yet. 

Thanks for the clarification. Pretty happy with the content on the horizon.

12 minutes ago, Mord said:

They didn't make it into SF off the bat either. Black Sea had quite a lot of content for a title release: 85 vehicles (US 25, RUS 40, UKR 20) and 91 on map formations (US 27, RUS 33, UKR 31). Shock Force had 49 vehicles (US 25, SYR 24) and 43 on map formations (US 11, SYR 32).  I'd say BS was chock full.

4 hours ago, IanL said:

?? there is only so much space in a release.

Not complaining about the amount of content in BS. IMHO it probably has more content than most other titles. I love that it has 3 unique factions.

USMC is my favourite American service. I like them more than US Army. I also prefer the VMF, and the VDV, to the MSV. Pop-culture-induced favouritism aside, I see why they picked US Army and MSV. It pleased the ravenous Fulda Gap fanatic, inside me.

Hope the modules take less time to push out than a redesign of an entire game and all its expansions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DerKommissar said:

Not complaining about the amount of content in BS. IMHO it probably has more content than most other titles. I love that it has 3 unique factions.

Nah, I didn't take it as complaining, just giving a little perspective on how much was actually in it. Trust me, I can't wait to get more stuff for BS! I want the Marines and the Brits, but the British are a long ways off, if they even do them. All it says in the PDF about forces is NATO, so who knows what non-US forces they might add later.

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm ok maybe Im wrong then. I really seem to recall him saying theyd like to add them - and yes i know exactly what youre saying about current events vs the game story line, I know its two 'worlds'.

I 100% remember seeing USMC and VDV and I know more was said as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Sublime said:

Hmm ok maybe Im wrong then. I really seem to recall him saying theyd like to add them - and yes i know exactly what youre saying about current events vs the game story line, I know its two 'worlds'.

I 100% remember seeing USMC and VDV and I know more was said as well.

I found this from May 2017 in the thread The Cove Australian profession of Arms.  Steve said in response to uncons in CMBS. 

Yup, that is entirely possible.  Though with CMSF2 on the way it won't be too long before those things will be covered in the existing Syrian scenario.

Link below:

http://community.battlefront.com/topic/125144-the-cove-the-australian-profession-of-arms/?do=findComment&comment=1713288

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Sublime said:

Hmm ok maybe Im wrong then. I really seem to recall him saying theyd like to add them - and yes i know exactly what youre saying about current events vs the game story line, I know its two 'worlds'.

I 100% remember seeing USMC and VDV and I know more was said as well.

I'd be pretty happy even if they pick VDV over VMF.

VDV got a lot of really unique vehicles. I'd love to play as/against a modern day Mobile Infantry. APCs, IFVs, SPGs and tank destroyers falling from the sky! Oh well, maybe not that... still want to see those ****ty little BMDs.

Uncons would make a lot of sense too. I'd be pretty happy with introducing asymmetric gameplay to BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, MOS:96B2P said:

I found this from May 2017 in the thread The Cove Australian profession of Arms.  Steve said in response to uncons in CMBS. 

Yup, that is entirely possible.  Though with CMSF2 on the way it won't be too long before those things will be covered in the existing Syrian scenario.

Link below:

http://community.battlefront.com/topic/125144-the-cove-the-australian-profession-of-arms/?do=findComment&comment=1713288

 

Thanks. I honestly cant remember if that was what I remembered or what. Again though Im b@t$hit crazy soo...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/4/2018 at 4:11 PM, Sublime said:

Thanks. I honestly cant remember if that was what I remembered or what. Again though Im b@t$hit crazy soo...

I remember it too. Although any CMBS 'uncons' will probably me more akin to conventional forces compared to the Syrian uncons. Volunteers, 'green man', mercenaries, vacationers; I'd say that even with the CMBS backstory a realistic case can be made for the Russian 'hybrid' warfare incorporating not only formal state combatants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i definitely mimagined BFCs take on uncons would be paramilitaries prpbably mostly fascist types defending Ukraine and uncons for Novo Rossiya uncons

 I also pictired higer end uncons like Wagner Group... is there an infamous or elite ukrainian merc group like Americas Blackwater USA or Russias Wagner

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2018 at 12:43 PM, DerKommissar said:

Thanks for the clarification. Pretty happy with the content on the horizon.

Not complaining about the amount of content in BS. IMHO it probably has more content than most other titles. I love that it has 3 unique factions.

USMC is my favourite American service. I like them more than US Army. I also prefer the VMF, and the VDV, to the MSV. Pop-culture-induced favouritism aside, I see why they picked US Army and MSV. It pleased the ravenous Fulda Gap fanatic, inside me.

Hope the modules take less time to push out than a redesign of an entire game and all its expansions.

What is MSV ? My google-fu could not determine what it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Sequoia said:

What is MSV ? My google-fu could not determine what it was.

Yeah, sorry about that -- I was using stupid lingo. MSV stands for Моторизо́ванные стрелко́вые войска which translates to Motor Rifle Forces. It refers to the Motor Rifle Divisions that make up the bulk of the (ex) Warsaw Pact armies -- and are the antagonists of CMBS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×