Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Battlefront.com

      Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips   12/27/2016

      Hi all! Now that Upgrade 4 is out and about in large quantities we have now discovered a few SNAFUs that happen out in the scary, real world that is home computing.  Fortunately the rate of problems is extremely small and so far most are easily worked around.  We've identified a few issues that have similar causes which we have clear instructions for work arounds here they are: 1.  CMRT Windows customers need to re-license their original key.  This is a result of improvements to the licensing system which CMBN, CMBS, and CMFB are already using.  To do this launch CMRT with the Upgrade and the first time enter your Engine 4 key.  Exit and then use the "Activate New Products" shortcut in your CMRT folder, then enter your Engine 3 license key.  That should do the trick. 2.  CMRT and CMBN MacOS customers have a similar situation as #2, however the "Activate New Products" is inside the Documents folder in their respective CM folders.  For CMBN you have to go through the process described above for each of your license keys.  There is no special order to follow. 3.  For CMBS and CMFB customers, you need to use the Activate New Products shortcut and enter your Upgrade 4 key.  If you launch the game and see a screen that says "LICENSE FAILURE: Base Game 4.0 is required." that is an indication you haven't yet gone through that procedure.  Provided you had a properly functioning copy before installing the Upgrade, that should be all you need to do.  If in the future you have to install from scratch on a new system you'll need to do the same procedure for both your original license key and your Upgrade 4.0 key. 4.  There's always a weird one and here it is.  A few Windows users are not getting "Activate New Products" shortcuts created during installation.  Apparently anti-virus software is preventing the installer from doing its job.  This might not be a problem right now, but it will prove to be an issue at some point in the future.  The solution is to create your own shortcut using the following steps: Disable your anti-virus software before you do anything. Go to your Desktop, right click on the Desktop itself, select NEW->SHORTCUT, use BROWSE to locate the CM EXE that you are trying to fix. The location is then written out. After it type in a single space and then paste this:

      -showui

      Click NEXT and give your new Shortcut a name (doesn't matter what). Confirm that and you're done. Double click on the new Shortcut and you should be prompted to license whatever it is you need to license. At this time we have not identified any issues that have not been worked around.  Let's hope it stays that way Steve
    • Battlefront.com

      Forum Reorganization   10/12/2017

      We've reorganized our Combat Mission Forums to reflect the fact that most of you are now running Engine 4 and that means you're all using the same basic code.  Because of that, there's no good reason to have the discussion about Combat Mission spread out over 5 separate sets of Forums.  There is now one General Discussion area with Tech Support and Scenario/Mod Tips sub forums.  The Family specific Tech Support Forums have been moved to a new CM2 Archives area and frozen in place. You might also notice we dropped the "x" from distinguishing between the first generation of CM games and the second.  The "x" was reluctantly adopted back in 2005 or so because at the time we had the original three CM games on European store shelves entitled CM1, CM2, and CM3 (CMBO, CMBB, and CMAK).  We didn't want to cause confusion so we added the "x".  Time has moved on and we have to, so the "x" is now gone from our public vocabulary as it has been from our private vocabulary for quite a while already.  Side note, Charles *NEVER* used the "x" so now we're all speaking the same language as him.  Which is important since he is the one programming them
kraze

BM Oplot needs its ammo choice fixed

Recommended Posts

Even in the latest version (2.10) BM Oplot uses ATGM exclusively to attack enemy tanks even at sub 300m distances - which makes these tanks useless (or outright easy prey in tank duels) since missiles tend to hit trees or completely miss due to a slower movement than SABOT even though the latter would almost certainly penetrate any tank at such distance. And this issue is here since the initial release. What gives? Why can't the game have Oplot use ATGM only at distances of 2km or above where it would make sense?

Weird that it does not affect russian tanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, kraze said:

Even in the latest version (2.10) BM Oplot uses ATGM exclusively to attack enemy tanks even at sub 300m distances - which makes these tanks useless (or outright easy prey in tank duels) since missiles tend to hit trees or completely miss due to a slower movement than SABOT even though the latter would almost certainly penetrate any tank at such distance. And this issue is here since the initial release. What gives? Why can't the game have Oplot use ATGM only at distances of 2km or above where it would make sense?

Weird that it does not affect russian tanks

I am playing a PBEM and had this happen in ~20% of my collective tanks shots.  The target in that instance was a Khrizantema, not a tank, it missed.  Two fragmentation rounds were shot at infantry and two APFSDS were shot at a tank and another Khrizantema.  I am not including area fire, but those shot seem to always be frag.  Game just started so things may change. 

Stefano

Edited by Stefano Z

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

There is a very simple and utterly realistic solution to this issue that requires almost no work on the teams' part.  :P 

I can think of at least two such solutions, but which one are you thinking of? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

Remove the Oplots, they are mostly fictional (ask the Thais).  ;)

You know, if you hate them that much, just ignore the fact they are in the game. The way you obsess about their mere existence borders on the absurd. 

P.S. : why don't you harp on the same way about the T-90AM or the fact that the Syrians in CMSF have BMP-3s? 

PPS: Thailand apparently has taken delivery of 25 Oplots. That's hardly fictional.

Edited by LukeFF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LukeFF said:

PPS: Thailand apparently has taken delivery of 25 Oplots. That's hardly fictional.

All 49 already done, last party is preparing to final tests before shipping. First Oplot company will be in Ukrainain army at the end of 2017. Very want to believe. There is rumors, that on Tank Challenge-2018 our team will participate on BM Oplot.

About bug, yes, I also have been spotting this sometime on Bulats too, but I didn't check statistic how much per 100 shots. Looks like AI in some situations is chose more strong ammunition, especially against tanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, c3k said:

Okay...something to possibly look into.

I had an Oplot choosing missile vs sabot against a tank ~1.5 km away, same game I mentioned in the previous post.  As far as that game is concerned ~half the time the Oplot fires an ATGM against tanks... n = 2, I am aware it is not ideal.  At least selective pressure should weed out those ATGM-loving tank commanders fairly quickly...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, LukeFF said:

P.S. : why don't you harp on the same way about the T-90AM or the fact that the Syrians in CMSF have BMP-3s? 

Because the former is a decent representation of the T-90M, and the BMP-3s are handy for the UAE in CM:SF.

8 hours ago, LukeFF said:

PPS: Thailand apparently has taken delivery of 25 Oplots. That's hardly fictional.

They ordered double that and they're already three years late, the Thais have since turned to the Chinese to fill their future requirements.

6 hours ago, Haiduk said:

All 49 already done, last party is preparing to final tests before shipping. First Oplot company will be in Ukrainain army at the end of 2017. Very want to believe. There is rumors, that on Tank Challenge-2018 our team will participate on BM Oplot.

Even if these are actually delivered (albeit just a teeny bit late) it still doesn't put any BM Oplots in the hands of the Ukrainian military, which is what the game represents.....If someone gets the urge to model the Thais at war, I guess we'll finally have a use for Oplots, but other than that it's a diminishing number of Bulats & then T-64BVs all the way (unless we happen to get some earlier T-72s or the T-80).

Edited by Sgt.Squarehead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the problem is that the APFSDS ammunition Ukraine uses is old Soviet stock from the 80s that performs poorly against the latest Russian tanks. The ATGM has better penetration. It shouldn't be using missiles against soft skinned vehicles, however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/19/2017 at 4:44 AM, kraze said:

Even in the latest version (2.10) BM Oplot uses ATGM exclusively to attack enemy tanks even at sub 300m distances

I too have noticed this with UKR tanks in general. They tend to default to using the ATGMs, regardless of range. 

3 minutes ago, Vanir Ausf B said:

Part of the problem is that the APFSDS ammunition Ukraine uses is old Soviet stock from the 80s that performs poorly against the latest Russian tanks. The ATGM has better penetration. It shouldn't be using missiles against soft skinned vehicles, however.

This is what I think is happening as well. The TacAI is using the ammo best suited to destroying the target, and because the ATGMs are much better than the sabot rounds they carry, they tend to default to the ATGMs all the time. 

Not sure if its a bug, or if it should be heavily tweaked or not to be honest. But at the very least I can say that I too observe the behavior. 

P.S The behavior is also present in CMSF to some extent. T62s tend to engage all targets with the ATGMs first, for what I assume is the same reason the UKR tanks do the same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ATGM launch has a sence from well covered position and as a rule on long range (where APFSDS significantly lost own penetration capabilities). By soviet doctrine, tank ATGMs are "long hand" with ranges of launch over 2 km and more. Of course, real combat has different situation, but even on Donbas with mostly flat/small hills terrain, tank ATGM launches were too rare. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ATGM load process  is slower, ATGM time to target is longer. It is never really a choice in modern conflict about what to type of ammo to use under 2km which encompasses like 80% of CM ranges. IMO under 2km the round selection process should be AP>HE/HEAT without even a hint of ATGM. Over 2km it should be AP>ATGM then everything else. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BTR said:

IMO under 2km the round selection process should be AP>HE/HEAT without even a hint of ATGM. Over 2km it should be AP>ATGM then everything else. 

According to Fofanov HEAT has less dispersion then APFSDS , but because its muzzle velocity 900-1000 m/s, they are not so good for firing on moving targets with relatively big angle speed.

Edited by Haiduk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure that applies to modern rounds any longer since his text is about 70s trials. Besides, dispersion is a rather abstract form of measuring total accuracy because it fixes everything else (distance, ballistic trajectories, time to targets) and watches round characteristics only. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/7/2017 at 5:15 AM, Vanir Ausf B said:

Part of the problem is that the APFSDS ammunition Ukraine uses is old Soviet stock from the 80s that performs poorly against the latest Russian tanks. The ATGM has better penetration. It shouldn't be using missiles against soft skinned vehicles, however.

I had no problems with Oplot vs.T72B3/T90A penetration whenever the former used APFSDS, especially at sub 1km distances. So it's not bad at all. The problem is that it does that rarely and ATGMs are slow, have a higher chance to miss and, worst of all, will detonate when encountering a branch or a bush - making Oplots harmless. And on a modern battlefield where the one who hits first is the one who wins that's critical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎07‎/‎11‎/‎2017 at 6:13 AM, LukeFF said:

The UAE? :lol: Since when has CMSF modeled the forces of the UAE?

Since the squabbling with Qatar started out.....I'm constantly messing around with things in the editor, to see what can and can't be modelled, I've done Turks, Saudis, the UAE, Qataris, Kurds, Hezbollah, Al Shebab & Boko Haram, to name but a few.  ;)

It's kind of tricky to do the Ukrainians though, far too many Oplots, not enough T-72s (or T-80s):

a8f7b522a552.jpg

Edited by Sgt.Squarehead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh, speaking of Oplots, 41st one just left for field trials last month with a 1st Nov. deadline for delivery. I've not heard much since then but there are only 8 left in the contract after that which means it might be completed in 2018 after all.  

Edited by BTR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×