AttorneyAtWar Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 And why! For me its the BMP-3M with any of its add-on packages, although I am partial to the ERA because of how it looks. I love my Abrams and my Bradleys (I am an American after all) but the BMP-3 just has this coolness factor around it for me, that 100mm and 30mm cannon are probably what it is and its looks in general definitely help with Kieme and BTR's mods added. I am pretty sure I fell in love with it completely after that amazing assault river crossing in the Russian campaign. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splinty Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) I really like the T 90AM, it's a solid tank. If used correctly it can hold it's own with the Abrams. And it just looks really cool! Edited April 6, 2015 by Splinty 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vergeltungswaffe Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 <---- Homegrown coolness. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kraft Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) PBEM: Edited April 6, 2015 by Kraft 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanzfeld Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Viper 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T-90AM for me too then the Oplot and the Bradley (BMP_2M and BMP-3M will be among them when the commander/gunner communication issue is solved and the 30mm on the BMP-2M will have the same APFDS ammo as the BMP-3M) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 The old T64 is a nostalgic favorite of mine. Its the underdog. Getting kills with an Abrams is easy, getting kills with your T64 is an accomplishment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAKODA Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T90AM. I love when they are on my side, but get very nervous when I am fighting against them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panzersaurkrautwerfer Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I was once a M1A2 SEP V2 company commander. So I'm sort of attached to them (even if ours lacked ERA or the APS). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djiaux Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T-90AM and also the Tunguska. The first one is reaaaly good, when I have some I feel like I have great assets but can be owned so I have to be careful, when they are on the other side I have to be really careful too cause they can ruin your day quickly. The Tunguska because when I move my tunguska to shoot some infantry or to area fire I'm all happy, fire, fire, fire, fire, aaahahahaha. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacroix Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 that more expensive AA, is it tungushka? it can be used against ground targets. i love its sound+bullets in the air more than any other vehicle's armor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccabe Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 The t64 has something special about it even though it's not amazing I still like it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akd Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I love the looks of BM Bulat for some reason. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdolmartin Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 It has to be the Tunguska. That majestic appearance, that awe-inspiring dual 30 cannon... And frankly, killing it with infantry feels like a huge accomplishment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slysniper Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I love the Tunguska . It is a ugly machine (so it is not about its looks) it lacks needed armor. (Too easy to kill if you can get a shot on it) But from the very first time I ever used one, which was as I recall, used to take out a sniper in the top floor of a building and I watched as it basically sawed the floor of the building away in 30 seconds. (thinking to myself, now there is some firepower) I never have not enjoyed seeing it control a fight with its only good asset (Firepower) How can you not love that power. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agusto Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 My favorite is the T-90AM. It is reasonably cheap in QBs but still packs enough punch to deal with anything the Ukrainians have and, if used correctly, can even kill the M1A2. I rarely play a QB as Russians without buying a at least one platoon of T-90AMs. The Tunguska is cool, but it lacks the firepower to deal with heavier targets IMO. It is great though for shooting up infantry in buildings and lightly armoured vehicles. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexey K Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T-72 and BMP-2. Don't ask me why 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antaress73 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T-72 I can understand but the non -M version of the BMP-2 ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexey K Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 T-72 I can understand but the non -M version of the BMP-2 ? It is love, it's supposed to be irrational 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC 337 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 BMP-3, gotta love the hammer and eggshell that it brings with its ridiculous amount of cannons and mgs, paired with its catastrophic explosions should anything touch it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apocal Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 BMP-3, gotta love the hammer and eggshell that it brings with its ridiculous amount of cannons and mgs, paired with its catastrophic explosions should anything touch it. 50cal to the fuel tank, slight chance of nuclear explosion to follow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablius Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 The M1200 Armored Knight! Just for the cool name... Can´t believe they wasted that cool name in a vehicle that: 1) It´s not (really) armored 2) It´s not doing anything resembling a knight It should be call the M1200 Stalking Archer...but maybe then no one would want to ride on it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agusto Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Many US vehicles dont have suffeciently martial names IMO. They should have called the M1A2 'Armored Knight', ther M109 'Steel Rain' and the M2A3 something like 'Horse of the Horsemen of Apocalypse' (although that is a bit long). I mean why shoud the enemy be afraid of a tank called 'Abrams'? Just because it has a huge gun that can kill everything it sees and is almost impossiblke to destroy? A vehicles name should reflect its deadliness. Edited April 8, 2015 by agusto 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieme(ITA) Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Well, if anyone studied military history should be afraid of Abrams... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sublime Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Its tradition. Different names of weapon systems though the true name really is m ####. The actual name is to make it easier to remember. Tanks and ifvs traditionally have had famous US generals as their namesakes. In Ww2 it was Civil War generals. Abrams was a famous and extremely successful US armor cmdr during WW2 and led a very successful career after 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.