Jump to content

BluecherForward

Members
  • Posts

    147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    BluecherForward got a reaction from Commanderski in CMRT Module 1 Bones   
    Count me in! What about Seelow Heights? Hope that one is covered.
  2. Like
    BluecherForward reacted to Ts4EVER in CMRT Module 1 Bones   
    Yes, I am more than willing to pay for packs with well made scenarios about WWII operations.
  3. Like
    BluecherForward reacted to MikeyD in CMRT Module 1 Bones   
    Funny how nobody ever seems to mention the Vistula-Oder offensive where the bulk of the German army was crushed and the Russians moved the front 482km west in less than a month. People instead like to talk about Danzig or Budapest or Vilnius or Serbian partisans or the islands off Estonia in the Baltic. The Eastern Front covers a LOT of real estate. BFC could do ten different battle packs just for events taking place between January and March.
  4. Like
    BluecherForward got a reaction from Commanderski in Question - Amiens Tonight, Prelude on the Seine   
    Current SITREP: So I am down to under 30 minutes left in the scenario. I tried to follow the guidelines for the scenario at first - leapfrogging companies toward the JELLALABAD Objective, while sending B Company to Objective Don. Very slow moving, but makes for some excitement when contact is made. After encountering two Panzer IVs and a platoon-plus of infantry on Obj JELLALABAD - as well as taking some heavy losses from arty en-route, I decided to use arty and smoke (in sequence) to suppress the enemy at JELLALABAD. The arty - full blast of 25 pounders - did a number on the infantry. Since I did not have my tanks yet, I tried to advance PIATS - using cover of smoke - to take out the Panzer IVs. This did not go well - although it did force the panzers back over the crest of the hill. They kept backing-up as my Tommies fired PIATs. The panzers are still there, however, and now I have less PIATs...
    So I decided to avoid enemy strength and go for an indirect approach - sending my tanks, once they arrived, on an end-run over Objective DON (which I had already taken) towards Objective ACK, reinforcing B Company. I used smoke from 51mm mortars to get A Company across the stream to advance on Obj CHARLIE, while D Company (reinforced by the two remaining armored cars - mines!) exploited the woods to skirt the panzers to the east (right) - taking the Chateau (Obj BEER) - en route to Bois Jerome. I left C Co, the under-strength company, in a defensive / blocking position on JELLALABAD. Maybe it will be able to exploit forward as the situation develops.
    In the meantime, I am fighting off a platoon-sized counterattack on Obj DON (maybe that is why I did not get the 90 points?).  My plan is to either leverage the panzers back off Obj JELLALABAD as I advance on both flanks and behind them, or attack them from all sides once I have them cut off - we'll see. I am suspecting that the enemy will get a vote on all of this as well. There is also the time factor. I have included the map image below to illustrate the situation.

  5. Upvote
    BluecherForward got a reaction from Warts 'n' all in Question - Amiens Tonight, Prelude on the Seine   
    See below, I do not know how to delete this.
     
     
  6. Upvote
    BluecherForward got a reaction from Warts 'n' all in Question - Amiens Tonight, Prelude on the Seine   
    I guess if there was still a German hiding somewhere in the objective area it would not be ticked, right?
  7. Upvote
    BluecherForward reacted to Sgt.Squarehead in Infantry Riding Tanks   
    Of course that could rapidly become a disadvantage, if the guys with the HEAT launchers are paying more attention than the guys on the tank.
  8. Upvote
    BluecherForward got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in Infantry Riding Tanks   
    A good place to start for a campaign/scenario:
    http://www.69th-infantry-division.com/
  9. Like
    BluecherForward reacted to MOS:96B2P in Infantry Riding Tanks   
    I didn't edit my post quick enough .... we already have SS & Luftwaffe in CMFB.  I'm currently in the CMRT editor and am thinking about RT stuff. 
    +1   A CM title that includes both Western forces and the Soviets would fantastic IMO.  My hope is that the last release for CMFB will be an equipment pack introducing Soviet forces/equipment into CMFB.  Call it meeting on the Elbe River or something.  Then the US, Commonwealth and Soviets would all be in the same Combat Mission game.   No BFC created scenarios would be needed.  Just an equipment pack of already designed equipment ported over from CMRT.  Scenario designers and mod creators could do all kinds of cold war, neo-colonialism stuff.  Patton goes east 1945, Fulda Gap 1948, Korea, Suez Crisis, etc.    Just put them in the same game.  
  10. Upvote
    BluecherForward got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in Infantry Riding Tanks   
    It would be nice to have the meeting at Torgau with the Soviets - just for fun!
  11. Like
    BluecherForward reacted to Warts 'n' all in Loss of tank crew   
    I assume this is what Normandy looks like when one has partaken of too much holy weed. 
  12. Like
    BluecherForward reacted to Sgt.Squarehead in Loss of tank crew   
    Indeed, but I can't very well demonstrate crew-swapping in CM:BN (CM:RT et al) as it doesn't bloody work! 
  13. Like
    BluecherForward got a reaction from A Canadian Cat in CMFI Version 4   
    Thanks IanL and Schrullenhaft, I put in a ticket and they straightened this out for me. It was an activation issue. I am up and running in Italy!
  14. Upvote
    BluecherForward got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in Is there a Mod site somewhere?   
    Thanks MOS:96B2P for the info and to you and Sgt Squarehead for your candidness.
     
  15. Like
    BluecherForward got a reaction from Commanderski in Is there a Mod site somewhere?   
    Thank you Commanderski!
×
×
  • Create New...