Jump to content

professionalXMAZ

Members
  • Content Count

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About professionalXMAZ

  • Rank
    Junior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just turn back now Chibot, why throw away your lives to my superior american missiles?
  2. https://old.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/am4am9/lada_of_ukrainian_army/
  3. as a web dev by trade I'm curious - the engine is the same between red thunder and SF2 right? But the animations aren't transferrable between games?
  4. thanks for the full response. Never said it kills QB but as @MikeyD showed further up his entire armored force got smoked by redfor air with no way to fight back, so again, not sure how our argument is weak. Fair enough on not wanting to put in x representing y. and please don't remove redfor air support! also this video of syrian airpower being timely and effective against an enemy without manpads IRL
  5. why? people want a fun game, not 'brits don't get aa bc our books say they don't and we have rules for ourselves' i don't think the solution is removing syrian airpower. shooting at eachother is fun. being unable to shoot back is not fun. even against the brainless qb ai it annihilated his tanks and he couldn't fight back at all. They have starstreak. It's from 1997 - present. So yea, i don't understand what the argument is even about or why it was removed. Who cares if it's stingers not starstreak. Please keep the british competitive and give them back AA capability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starstreak In July 2001, Thales received a contract for a Successor Identification friend or foe system for Starstreak.[6] In mid-2007, Thales UK in Northern Ireland revealed that it had developed Starstreak II, a much improved successor to the Starstreak missile. Some of the advantages included in this new missile are an improved range of 7 km (4.3 mi), improved lethality,[2][3] an improved targeting system and the ability to operate it at much higher altitudes,[7] up to 5 km (16,000 ft).[8]
  6. played a big QB today as redfor and my dang dudes had to slog it over like at least half a mile, but i had plenty of tanks they could have ridden on. Tell me it ain't so
  7. eyyy so the thing is I've reinstalled 3 times before rujasu recommended it and idk what the deal is. I'll work with rujasu to get screens of the setup and try to replicate it @IanL also rujasu tried creating a game after my reinstall and I wasn't able to join at all, said wrong module version (in red script, said it was X version, don't remember if it was NATO or marines) @Sgt.Squarehead as long as they're aware of the 'suggest forces' bug i'm fine
  8. Tried and failed to set up a pair of SF2 PBEM quick battles, syria v syria meeting engagement, tiny/small, mixed forces (don't remember map first time). Try 1: set up 2 different games with the above settings and sent them to two different players. bug1: the map changed from the one I selected bug2: opposing players had most of their units disappear from force selection -> deployment. Try 2: same thing except the map stayed correct - the opposing forces AGAIN disappeared so they only have a handful of BTRs. map: desert crossroads I only have the base module. One opponent has expansions, one doesn't. This is on top of my game crashing almost every time I press 'suggest forces' for qb, regardless of settings.
  9. it happens reliably for a variety of game modes, maps and force selections. I'll provide more details when I get home in a couple hours
  10. w respect to the crash - it's happened three times, I can get video of it if you want... it was twice with syrian forces, once with american. different map each time
  11. I'm in Europe until mid september, when I get back I'll be down to play. Full disclosure I'm a brand new player and a battalion level operation for my first PBEM might be above my ability, but I'll do it. Is rad an abbreviation for a map?
  12. hey i'm brand new to this game, I hear he got banned... I'm wondering why the download for 2.4 is split into 10 parts if most of them have identical files inside? It says to combine them, but with identical file names it will just ask to overwrite / skip / stop please advise
×
×
  • Create New...