General Liederkranz
Members-
Posts
246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
General Liederkranz last won the day on September 11 2018
General Liederkranz had the most liked content!
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
General Liederkranz's Achievements
Senior Member (3/3)
107
Reputation
-
DougPhresh reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
Hardradi reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
General Liederkranz replied to Aured's topic in Combat Mission Red Thunder
I agree with @Hardradi and @Freyberg. A steamroller attack on a 250m front, focusing on presenting overwhelming firepower and moving fast enough to keep ahead of the German artillery, works. This does require lots of micromanagement and Target Light commands, but to me that's entirely realistic--platoons are going to have standing orders to lay down cover fire on suspected enemy positions, not just to shoot at identified enemies. The game engine can't do this so the player has to. The force ratios are fine, especially since if you attack on a narrow front you can avoid engaging some of the Germans from the front, or at all. I flubbed up my first play through, mainly because I was new to CM and should not have started with this scenario. The one thing I think could have been improved--and the one place where I benefited, but realistically, from having played it before--is that there should be some pre-battle intelligence for the Soviet player. They historically would have this and it really helps in picking a general target area for the rockets. -
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
Lethaface reacted to a post in a topic: Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
-
Soviet Infantry Battalion Attack
General Liederkranz replied to Aured's topic in Combat Mission Red Thunder
There have been several good threads on this over the years; searching for the title of hte campaign and the scenario will turn them up. The premise of this scenario is that either the preliminary artillery was largely ineffective, or that you've been knocked off schedule so you're not following closely behind the barrage, which is why all you get is that one rocket mission. Some people have rejected that as unrealistic but it doesn't seem so to me--surely that kind of thing happened sometimes and the battalion commander had to make the best of it. I''m not an expert on Soviet doctrine but from what I've read, I think you'd see the 3 rifle companies attacking in column, each behind the next, each company with its three platoons on line on a front of about 250m. I do not think the Soviets would keep a whole company in reserve at this level; maybe a platoon if that. All the battalion MGs and probably the SU-76s would support from the start line, then move up. Mortars would be on call through flares or a human chain, which is simulated in CM by the slow call times (I learned the human chain method in reply to a question I posted here a year or two ago--to me the key is that it's not unrealistic or gamey to have Soviet lower HQs call in fire missions, despite the lack of radios). The lead company would advance until enemy fire is so intense they can't move forward any more; then they'd go to ground and return fire while the next company comes up and overruns the resistance. Casualties would be heavy, but a company backed by multiple MGs and SU-76s on a narrow front can put out a lot of firepower. The key is not to get pinned down by flanking fire and to move fast enough to avoid the artillery. When I've tried it this way (with some house rules to limit myself for better roleplaying) I find it works but most of my losses come from artillery hitting my second or third echelon. -
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: CM WWII: Are tanks "overpowered"?
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: CM WWII: Are tanks "overpowered"?
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: CM WWII: Are tanks "overpowered"?
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: CM WWII: Are tanks "overpowered"?
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: "Invalid Smoke Target"
-
General Liederkranz reacted to a post in a topic: Mechanized Unload Sweet Spot
-
In addition to what others have said, Hunt isn't likely to be useful here. First, the spotters will move crouched over, which is more visible than crawling. Second, Hunt won't actually stop the spotters moving as soon as they have a line of sight to the enemy positions, as I think you were hoping. Unless you take fire, they will keep moving until they get an actual spot on an identified enemy unit. That will take longer, and it's also unnecessary since you already know where the enemy is and you don't need a full spot to call in the mortars. The best way to find a position with LOS to the enemy position isn't Hunt, but as @Erwin says, to plot some fake waypoints before you start moving and then trace LOS from those to the enemy. Once you find a spot with a good LOS, Slow move to it, not Hunt. If you're playing against the AI, you also could have a unit deeper in the woods Pop Smoke toward the spot you want the spotter to go. They can throw the grenade toward the treeline, even to a spot they can't see. If you point the purple line in the right direction and account for wind, you might be able to place the smoke just right to give enough cover for the spotter to Slow crawl in (then have them Hide until after the smoke clears). Against a human opponent this will probably draw fire but if the AI can't see you, it won't shoot at you. Another possibility is to move someone else into position somewhere else, but with an LOS to the same enemies, a minute before the spotters arrive, and have them start a firefight to divert the enemy's attention.
-
zmoney reacted to a post in a topic: Weapons Plt Leader
-
Warts 'n' all reacted to a post in a topic: Weapons Plt Leader
-
In CMBN and CMFB the weapons platoon leader does have a radio, and so does his top sergeant in the HQ support team. This may represent an improved TO&E in 1944-45 compared to the 1943 version in CMFI. The weapons platoon organization changed significantly from 1943 to 1944 so it's possible that the army agreed the old organization made it too cumbersome to use the mortars. In any case I believe the SCR-536 handheld radios were issued at the company level, so the game programming must be making some guesses about how they'd be allocated to platoons. I seem to recall that in some previous version of CMFI, maybe 3.0, the 4th platoon leader *did* have a radio, and that this changed in 4.0, but I don't know if this is deliberate and I may be remembering wrong.
-
How important is upgrade 4 to CMRT?
General Liederkranz replied to Nick W's topic in Combat Mission Red Thunder
I think it helps in two main ways: 1) the Hull Down command introduced in 4.0 can be very useful in the tank-heavy scenarios of CMRT, and 2) Soviet squads are generally better off unsplit, so the improved spacing in v4 keeps them alive more effectively (and makes it more realistic looking compared to the old conga lines). To me the other parts don't make as big a difference. Corner peeking looks cool but I don't recall it making a huge difference in any CMRT scenarios I've played. CMRT did suffer from the fleeing-from-fortifications bug before 4.01, but of course it was never affected by the single-shot Bren/BAR/Breda problem. -
Proximity fuzes in GL?
General Liederkranz replied to rocketman's topic in Combat Mission Fortress Italy
I believe that the Personnel setting is also only available for missions plotted before the game starts, or near TRPs--on the assumption that the artillery knows the exact range to TRPs, or has time to measure it before the game starts, so they can set the fuses appropriately. -
BletchleyGeek reacted to a post in a topic: Rome to Victory Pre-orders are now open
-
Sgt.Squarehead reacted to a post in a topic: Rome to Victory Pre-orders are now open
-
Surrendering soldier idea
General Liederkranz replied to user1000's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Related to this topic, I just witnessed an AI war crime. This guy surrendered then they threw a grenade at him anyway. (I'm not saying this is a bug; I imagine the enemy TacAI decided to fire before his own TacAI decided to surrender). -
Rome to Victory Pre-orders are now open
General Liederkranz replied to BFCElvis's topic in Combat Mission Fortress Italy
This probably refers to the M4A1 mortar carrier, a predecessor to the M21, not to the M4A1 medium tank. As I recall mortar carriers weren't coded yet when CMFI and GL came out. http://americangimuseum.org/collections/restored-vehicles/m4a1-mortar-carrier-halftrack-1943/ -
Sadly it seems this bug is still around, at least in CMFI 2.02. Playing the third scenario of the Troina campaign I observed a couple of occasions where cancelling a Target Light order causes a (US) unit to fire off one rifle grenade before they stop shooting. I wonder if the code cancels the "Light" limitation a split second before it cancels the "Fire" order? I have a saved game showing this behavior.
-
Howler reacted to a post in a topic: New "02" patches for Game Engine 4 are now available
-
Warts 'n' all reacted to a post in a topic: New "02" patches for Game Engine 4 are now available
-
As @Howler said this still sounds bugged to me. I did some tests with this scenario and noted that in v3.12 and v4, not only do the troops not flee forwards, they usually flee back, which makes far more sense. In 4.01 and 4.02 whenever they flee, it's always forward. So even if the issue here is that the pixeltruppen are seeing the elevation change in front of them as "better cover," that is itself new behavior in 4.01 and 4.02. The old behavior--seeking safer cover by moving back from the hedgerow--seems far more realistic to me.
-
A Canadian Cat - was IanL reacted to a post in a topic: Artillery Adjustment Bug or Feature?
-
81mm mortar penetration?
General Liederkranz replied to weapon2010's topic in Combat Mission - General Discussion
If you're seeing troops in buildings taking casualties from mortar shrapnel, it seems more likely that it came in through a window or door or shellhole than that it penetrated the building. I believe that probability is factored into the abstracted chance of taking casualties from a shellburst. -
Since I think v3.12 or v4, if you have an FO adjust a fire mission it adjusts *all* the fire missions he's currently directing. I know people have posted about this before but I can't find the threads now. I'm wondering if anyone recalls how this was resolved--was it judged not to be a bug but to be intended behavior? If so, I'm having trouble figuring out what it is supposed to represent.