Jump to content

Wiggum15

Members
  • Posts

    537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Wiggum15

  1. Great work, cant wait till the game is totally modded by you !
  2. Ok then why is the CMx2 engine still unable to use more then one CPU core ? Dual and Quad core CPU's are Standard since 10 years now...
  3. Very good point, maybe they can fix it (or should have fixed it already before releasing the game).
  4. Is there any reason there is no rocket artillery like the GRAD or the Smerch available ingame ? Both sites seem to use it pretty often...
  5. Or they just expect to have full Air supremacy from day one or two...if they really go "all in" like they would in a conflict against russia.
  6. Again, as far as i know CMx2 only uses one CPU core ! The AMD FX 6300 has six cores with 3,5 GHz which is good enough for most games and should be good enough for CMx2 (although single thread performance is bad). If you only care about CM, then get a Intel CPU with very high single thread performance. Your GTX 550 Ti is good enough for best quality settings in CM, if you have problems update you drivers or blame the engine.
  7. The whole idea of the 1/1 presentation of the game is that the player cares about the action down to the individual soldier.
  8. I think you choose a bad angle for the comparison, otherwise...i would say the second one looks best.
  9. ...isnt CMx2 the game that still does only support a single core ? I have a AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 955, overclocked to 4x 3.60GHz. ArmA3, a very very very CPU heavy game runs perfectly smooth in Full HD and max/high settings with 4xAA. Fact, the engine is old and awkward. Fact, if your PC is not 5 years old (or even older) there is probably very little a hardware upgrade will do to your CMx2 performance. If you have graphic/performance problems...better blame the engine first, your drivers second and only then think about the hardware...
  10. Im no native speaker, im a german typing English text as good as possible...maybe thats why it sounds aggressive to you.
  11. Great, maybe you can also tweak the color a bit, they just look too saturated and "brown".
  12. No, it does not. Dont talk about "low end" systems all the time as if someone with a "high end" system will not have any problems with the performance of CMx2 games. The CMx2 engine is just a very old and awkward one. Low performance and graphic glitches are nearly always the fault of the engine <-> hardware/drivers interaction. Especially AMD/ATI cards are known to have driver and performance issues with the engine. I have currently 10 games on my PC. ArmA3, Far-Cry 4... Oddly enough i can play anything in FullHD with max. or high settings without any stuttering or graphic glitches. The only problematic game is CMBS, but yeah...maybe i should update my "low end" hardware for the "high end" CMx2 graphics engine...LOL Takes ~5 minutes for me. Installed the game on my SSD for testing and it does not improve loading times at all so its clearly a AMD/ATI driver issue in connection with the CMx2 engine (textures).
  13. DO you plan to do a uniform mod for the us side ? Is it just me or does the multicam look awkward ?
  14. Again this has nothing to do with "low end" systems...its just another engine problem in connection with specific hardware/drivers.
  15. I also would love to see more realistic NAF soldiers with gorka uniforms and helmets.
  16. Again, Panicking in the military term is not a state of complete irrationality. It describes a state were the soldiers no longer care about orders or a victory on the battlefield, they only want to survive. This can get them killed but that does not mean that Panicking soldiers should show suicidal behavior, especially when inside buildings. The "lets get out of the building and stay in the open" thing is really annoying...if the Tac-AI at least would navigate them into some other good cover...
  17. I highly doubt that... Panicking is just the word the game uses for a mental state that gives survival the top priority and no longer cares about orders. - Getting out of the building ? Ok ! - Running towards the enemy where no cover at all is available ? WTF ! - Choosing a spot with zero cover and direct LOS to a enemy T72 ? WTF ! - Getting killed by a 120mm HE round from the T72 ? Priceless ! That is not panicking, thats being on some bad drugs...
  18. You also have to take into account the psychological effect of being inside a building, surrounded by stone walls. Even if they think its not safe enough anymore inside the building, the last thing they should do is to aimlessly run outside without a clear idea where they will take cover next...and standing in the open while facing a T72 is not my definition of taking cover... At least 2 squads committed suicide that way during my play-through of that mission, although there were more buildings and walls very close they choose to run to a complete open space with 0 cover...
  19. I know that would be the first comment... Does a professional soldier who panics loose all common sense ? There is a difference if someone panics, runs out of a building and gets killed while trying to reach another building or if someone just runs out of a building into to open (and stays there !) where there is zero cover and the air is full of lead anyway.
  20. Hi, i just played a scenario where a small joint UKR/US force defends a HQ against a Russian attack, i think the name of the scenario was "Alexanders house" or something like that...anyway... The russians had some BTR-80A with the brutal 30mm gun. Throughout the scenario my men run out of buildings who got hammered with the 30mm gun. The problem, there were enemy soldiers and tanks outside so the squads leaving the building got killed instantly ! If they had stayed inside the building they may have taken a few wounded but the chance of surviving would have been much higher. In another situation a panicking soldier ran out of a building into another one, that ok, but then he turned and ran outside again into the open...facing a enemy tank ! He stayed there and awaited death which came pretty quick... My point is: - panicking squads commit suicide to often Soldiers like solid stuff (trees/walls ect.) so they tend to cuddle with this kind of cover. I understand that they want to leave a building getting hit by a 30mm gun repeatedly but why do they run outside, ignore two other buildings next to them and just run into the open towards the enemy. A human reaction would be to stay inside the building and take cover, or at least have a plan like "we get into this other building" or "go behind the APC"...but not to aimlessly run outside into a spot with 0 cover...
  21. How long does it take for you to load a normal size scenario with best/best settings ? What about trees moving in the wind ? 50% performance drop ?
  22. What do you think, do automatic weapons need to be nerfed a bit ? Should lonely or isolated soldiers route faster ? I would say yes. The Formations (the "Death train") are much much tighter as in real life, also, soldiers always try to get to a specific part of that formation which results in unnecessary movement. Then you have the "isolated shooter kills my whole squad" cases and you wander why is this guy still there, why does he still fight ? Is he of fanatic motivation ?
  23. Yes, i get the same bug with the Standard versions, HD stuff works fine.
×
×
  • Create New...