Jump to content

Badger73

Members
  • Content Count

    1,008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Badger73 last won the day on January 17

Badger73 had the most liked content!

About Badger73

  • Rank
    Perpetual Novice
  • Birthday August 25

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Wisconsin - USA

Converted

  • Biography
    Started playing CMBfN in 2012
  • Location
    Wisconsin, USA
  • Interests
    military history - ancients, medieval, Napoleonic, ACW, WW2
  • Occupation
    IT project management

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. No. Only one common skin/markings would apply to all vehicles of the same type in a scenario.
  2. I suspect it has to do with authorized vendors; the bureaucracy of government procurement protocols. While I am not familiar with the British Ministry of Defence, the United States Department of Defense will only award contracts to authorized vendors who complete and maintain a pretty onerous vetting process. I know of several situations in the US where people from small organizations who are not vetted sub-contracted through CACI which is thoroughly vetted in order to perform Defense Department work. It makes sense to me that Battlefront would piggy-back off of someone else's credentials to avoid vetting hassles and costs at the small price of a reasonable fee through the agency of someone like Slitherine/Matrix. Tre' cool video. Thanks for sharing.
  3. What happens when you specify a "Target Armor" arc at the direction of the enemy threat?
  4. Any word on what's going on with the long forthcoming "Patton's Charge / Bradley at Bay" module? I'm very interested in that one.
  5. Off the cuff, I'd check how @umlaut's mods are tagged and then check (in the scenario editor) how that scenario is mod tagged. The original/older CM titles didn't use mod tagging as much as is done these days.
  6. I noticed that there is no sound of incoming shells before rounds detonated on the target area.
  7. @patrik pass - After you get your feet wet in this H2H match, consider checking out The Few Good Men to find future opponents. Good luck and good gaming.
  8. I suppose that's true when you count all CM games and maps. Within CMBN though, this specific bug regularly ruins play. It is not trivial within that title. However, I do understand that debugging it will be a major effort diverting resources from other more profitable work. I hope someone might wake up in the middle of the night, say "Eureka!", and find a fix for it soon though.
  9. Check here --> Combat Mission 2x Scenario List
  10. Normally, I would agree with you, especially at the normal anti-tank weapon ranges for the US Army WW2 37mm anti-tank gun.. However, by firing at 25 yards (@20 meters) distance from the rear of the targeted panzer's engine, I'm willing to believe this is likely a true story.
  11. I purchased a game as a gift once by buying another copy for myself a long while back. If I recall correctly, I emailed the order confirmation email information, download link, and order activation code to the person I gifted.
  12. @kohlenklau - If I'm calculating things correctly, you've been absent 15-March through last Sunday, 15-December. It's good to see your return. Welcome back. 😉
  13. This bug ruins bocage scenario's. It made @Holdit's beautifully crafted Ad Hoc at Chef-du-Pont unplayable for the Germans
×
×
  • Create New...