A Canadian Cat

Good, good, I was *not* thinking of stopping just noticing the different pace between the action in several of the ongoing AARs. Ever since playing Huzzar I discover that I enjoy recon and maneuver as much as the intense action. I just watched the latest turn this morning and stuff started happening. 1Co is being hit on their left flank by a troop or more of Churhills and a recon force drove right into the middle of 3 Battery's position as their infantry teams started arriving at the end of the turn. All hell is going to break loose there next turn. Hopefully I can get my screen shots sorted out and my writeup done this evening.

No, I do not worry about long stretches of quick moves for my guys. I tend to keep my Fast moves short - across the street. Certainly never longer than 100m. But with quick, I will plot great long multi way point moves with. But what I will do is only let them go until they are Tiring and then start adding 30 or 45s pauses at the way points and if they hit Tired then I pause for longer 1:15 or so at times. Or I cancel their moves and just quick to cover and stay until they are rested. The above applies during move to contact. Once my guys are where I want them they get rest and short bounding moves at quick or hunt as needed to pressure the enemy.

For certain. I tried to create a map in CMBN fro a real place. Several frustrating hours with little to show for it later - I gave up. I am more than half way through a map in CMFI (if my PBEM partners would just slow down a bit:-). I have spent many hours - most of which were actually enjoyable. I have a nice looking map with the basic elevations done and the farms and forest for about half. So, still lost of work to do but I find my self looking forward to it. I would defiantly wait for 2.0 to arrive for CMBN.

Question for those of you that have played shock force. I segment 7 at about time mark 13:40 or so there is a scene where the helicopter is firing on the Iranians. Is that straight out of CMSF? In other words can you see the attack helicopters firing at their ground targets? I have only played CMBN where you can only see the rounds coming in not the source air craft. Also, earlier, in that segment there are shots from the cock pit view flying over the battle field. Again same question are those straight CMSF recordings?

Very quiet turn. The Recon armoured car spotted at the end of the bridge backed away. So the panther that was sent to cover the bridge had nothing to see. 1 Platoon from 2 Company deploy to protect their convoy's flank. The have spotted no one as of yet. Meanwhile the lead units of 1 Company spot a Churchill off in the distance. Minute 1:49 Orders Orders are similarly quiet. Mostly moving 1 Company closer to the town... and 5 Company further into the woods.

I am glad to hear you are enjoying it. This DAR is certainly moving slower than the others on the forum right now so I was worried we were boring everyone:) Each turn is taking me a little under an hour to play. It is quiet now. I expect it will take over an hour later once things start heating up. The way I play is to watch the four areas of the map where things are happening starting with viewing from level 3 or 4 (so I can see the enemy positions and see what my guys spot). Then based on what I see I watch the turn from a few angles at ground level often locked on one of my units. If any fire is exchanged it gets some extra attention or sometimes I flip to watching my men from the enemy's position. Right now the areas of the battle field I am watching are: 5 Company moving to the hill and deploying into the forest. 1 and 2 Company's convoy across the river. 1 Company's move from cover to cover towards the town The village with the road bridge objective where the enemy recon has been spotted.

Yes, the 95 is awesome in close support for infantry. I like the Churchill with the 95 more then the 105 Sherman - and I love the 105 Sherman:) When ever I have those guys at my disposal I am newly amazed at how fast they are. Lots of fun. Of course the other thing to think about is the Firefly. Wow those guys are dangerous. I am currently fighting a battle now against an inordinate number of those guys and they are slicing and dicing my Panthers from the front. Damn I have to be way more careful.

I need to block access to the village to his recon units. 3 Company is staying in the nearby orchard a little longer. So, for now I order a Panther to take up a position on the main street with a view of the bridge. That should keep any armoured cars from crossing into the village. 1 Company continues to move from one covered position to another. And finally 5 company continues to deploy into the woods on the hill.

A little bit of action this turn. One of 2 Battery's Stugs is hit from an unknown source. Eventually the assailant is identified as a Stag Hound on the far side of the bridge near the village. 3 Company's sniper takes a few shots but only manages to force the commander to button up. I thought 2 Battery had the approaches to the bridge covered better. 1 Company continues to advance towards town using the cover of the forest and the support of 1 Battery. Meanwhile on their flank a Panther and a platoon from 2 Company take up positions to protect them.

When you put it like that is a wonder that any of these pixeltroops follow any of our orders. Well said.

+1 to that. And if you watch closely there are plenty of times when not following your orders are precisely the *right* thing for your troops to have done. I have seen guys that were ordered to cross the street in a relatively safe (or so I thought) part of the battle field come under fire from a previously unknown enemy and turn around and head back to cover. If they had followed my orders precisely they would all be dead. We often forget to remember those moments when something bad like the OP reported happens.

I usually operate in a compromise way in this regard - at least for large battles. When my infantry are moving to contact the squads stay together. Once contact is closer then I split some squads to allow for some forward elements - still not all of them. Then once the pointy end hit something then I start splitting squads as they move to take action / cover. This way I am not herding three times the number of cats right from the start and only take the added pain of more units to manage gradually as needed.

Totally the way I play big battles too. I have that large 20 000 point "quick" battle DAR going here "http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=105660" that battle is still very much in the recon and move to contact phase but it will get more interesting soon I am sure. But even now that is exactly how I am playing it. There are four separate actions on the go right now. Two are very quiet but there is a bit of fire exchanged between recon elements. Plus a third is looking like contact is imminent. In that battle I have over two battalions of units (check out the thread to see the force composition - do not want to give too much away to my opponent here). It does take an hour or so to play a turn with all those units. If you divide the battle into chunks you can handle it with a bit of patience. I have also arranged things so that two of my current PBEM games are platoon sized or less to help compensate for the time I need to spend on the big one.

Yes, this can be an annoying limitation that comes from the game design using action squares. For area fire you have to aim at the centre of the action square. If you cannot see the centre of the action square you cannot shot. If the tank can see the enemy in the window of the top floor then the can fire at the enemy but once they duck or leave the building you can no longer area fire at the very same spot you were just shooting at. Sigh. I personally run into this most often when fighting in an urban setting. It is frustrating when you cannot use your tanks to suppress suspected enemy positions in buildings down the street. You can issue move orders to several way points and then select each way point and add pauses and target commands to each. That is the mechanism to allow you to give complex orders. For your example issue a move order to a location where you can target the area you want. Select that way point. Add a pause to that way point (press the pause button multiple times to increase the length of the pause) then with the way point still selected pick a target command to the location you want the unit to shoot. Then deselect the way point and add additional movement commands as needed to get your guys to cover again. I would avoid using the cover arc for this since you don't know what is out there. If you know you want to fire at a suspected enemy position use the target command if you just want to watch an area and shoot if they spot an enemy, use the face command to point your guys in the right direction. Using both the face command and the target command the AI will usually switch to shoot at a spotted enemy that appears close by. However if you have a target arc set and an enemy is spotted outside the arc the AI will most likely *not* shoot at the enemy.

Yep - but I don't think I would like to share a crater with this guy though. I found it! The reason I could not find the screen shot of the huge crater left by an exploding Priest was because it was not a screen shot at all. I recorded a movie: http://youtu.be/puoS1STYwzc Now that's dug in.

Here is the overall position after 10min. Friendly force symbols in white with defensive positions in blue. Known enemy positions in red. Key terrain is marked in green. Right now I do not have much real intelligence on the enemy's force composition part from there is a sizable armor force with some recon elements leading the way. It looks like the British have moved into the main town quite quickly and are holding the high ground to the north as well as scouting the river area and bridge crossings. The approach to the town is proceeding well. Given that we know the enemy has positions in the town I see no need to rush. My plan is to have elements of 3 Battery to move to the South ridge line and get into an over watch position of the town. Meanwhile 1 Battery and 1 Company will use the woods to approach closer to the town. Once I see what I am up against I can plan some artillery and the final assault. 2 Company will provide flanking protect for 1 Company. 5 Company and 3 Company will occupy and hold the village with the road crossing and the hill that overlooks it. 3 Company will cross the river with support from the platoon of panthers and establish a bridge head. Again no real rush here I suspect that artillery will begin to fall shortly and I want to see where it falls before moving into obvious targets.

And if you captured it with any kind of time left sweep it again. And if you find you have some more spare time later - sweep it again

Me too. But the do make a nice big hole in the ground when you hit them just right. I thought I had a screen shot of that but I cannot find it. But I did find a nice big explosion from CMAK. At the 58s mark my AT gun scores a hit

Yes, I used the tips from StoneAge from this thread http://filefront.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?p=1342700 You should be able to download my kmz file to see what I did to create the overlays for my project.

Yeah, I have given up on the forum search too. But Google works pretty well, as long as you use the "site" keyword (try the following, without the []): [ site:battlefront.com normandy upgrade 2.0 ] That yielded some information that might answer some of the OP's questions: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Abattlefront.com+normandy+upgrade+2.0

Wow - stopped reading here. :mad: Which might be too bad because there could be questions that I could answer after that line.

Well, now we all know what that phrase means in one of your posts:)

I am pretty sure he is talking about the information you get when you click on a contact icon. See the discussion in this thread: http://www.battlefront.com/community/showpost.php?p=1307668&postcount=21

I think people just adapted AAR to DAR to make it clear they are writing as they go. I have stopped using forum search tool - just give it up and use Google instead I actually find stuff when I do that. On Google (or in one of their search bars) you can type [ site:battlefront.com ] in front of your desired search terms (not including the []). On top of that Google is cool with three letter words and allows you to use OR (|). So you can find all the AAR and DARs with this search string (again without the []): [ site:battlefront.com AAR | DAR ] Thusly http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Abattlefront.com+AAR|DAR

I have three overlay bmp files I am using. One for details, one for the contour lines from 53m to 85m and one for the contour lines from 90m-120m. I had to split up the contour lines because the higher elevation layers pretty much whited out the lower elevation layers. The detail overlay: If you want to see my bounding box and overlay polygons here is the Google earth file that holds it all. It contains a folder called Sicily DZ with the places, lines and polygons I used to create my overlay images. http://www.lesliesoftware.com/forforumposts/2012/SicilyDZ.kmz