eniced73

The point was that a poster said its hard talking to people.  I'm just pointing out Steve obviously doesn't think so.  Everyone gets time off, but maybe instead of 10 posts a day in the Ukraine thread, 9 posts a day and one day a month post something on the games he produces.

I am in same boat as you guys.  Three of the four turns in my CMBN and CMRT games show I timed out eventhough I hit CF and all files were with my opponents.  My in box was clean.  🤷‍♂️

I have made many posts with suggestions and requests. I try to now stop. Paraphrasing Steve: "We know best/better." 

IT WORKS. I love it. I know exactly what you refer to. My France 1940 battle in Les Attaques, the churchyard could use those as well. Good work Nige. 
Everything is in the eye of the beholder. BFC efforts seem to me to be a final hospice heartbeat away from death. MAYBE they are behind the scenes preparing for the big release of CMPW Combat Mission Putin's War after the war ends? Charles is coding in more aspects of drones and somebody is adding animation for jack in the box turret explosions?
But who knows.
Nige, @WimO and a few others are to me the "ALT BFC"...
BFC has not embraced to my knowledge anything we are doing. It is so sad. Bloody wankers.

steve's too busy posting in the Ukraine thread to read any of this.

Well the CM system can actually score something more than zero for the loosing side in a surrender. Surrendering gives the opponent all the occupy objectives. Touch objectives are still earned only. Parameters are still earned only and you can even just give points. So the scoring could be setup for a 2000 point match to straight up give each side 200 points, Then give 300 points for a few parameter objectives and the other 1500 to occupy objectives. Then the guys that completely gets trashed and surrenders gets only 200 points and their opponent gets a full scroe. The ones that surrender but have some forces left and put up a fight get up to 500 and their winning opponent does not get the full 2000.
Clearly I'm just picking numbers but the CM scoring system can already handle your objection against surrendering. Assuming of course its setup with that in mind.

I must say, I love the scenario valley of ashes, but there is a lot do and not a lot of time. I think it’s one of the slower playing scenarios due to size and the number of commands required each turn. It’s likely too big for a tournament where the majority of players are so uncommitted.

Any way to fill in for "NO SHOWS"?

In a week shy of 2 months, I and about 3 other guys have created a France 1940 mod of damn decent results. 
Call me an a-hole, but I think a few heads should hang in shame!
Get it here
 

Shouldn't the quality team or creator of the scenario / map have "pathfinding" on the checklist before release??  I don't think the consumer should have to test.  

This has been an issue for a  "long" time now.  Thought it might have been treated in the most recent patch but it has not.  Playing an updated CMBN game right now and still seeing the same issue you are above.  About all you do is run that squad back towards the lazy MF'ers that refuse to get up and run.  Once they get close enough they will tell them to get off their asses and rejoin the squad.  Frustrating, I know.  Unless your micromanaging every squad it is easy to miss sometimes.

This has been an issue for a  "long" time now.  Thought it might have been treated in the most recent patch but it has not.  Playing an updated CMBN game right now and still seeing the same issue you are above.  About all you do is run that squad back towards the lazy MF'ers that refuse to get up and run.  Once they get close enough they will tell them to get off their asses and rejoin the squad.  Frustrating, I know.  Unless your micromanaging every squad it is easy to miss sometimes.

yes ir really was only three. it counted the two khriz as tanks. I was very confused by that initially. My casualties would have been a lot lower if I hadnt had such a small map and after losing my armor your armor was able to very quickly move into my ATGMs minimim range. Combine that with the small map size making spotting my troops and Khriz childs play and it was a recipe for disaster.  Russians do much better in longer distances for a lot of the circumstances involved as you.ll see if you return my turns.

Screw the peng thread.

There is a MOD for that.  Will not hurt your frames and is not graphic-intensive. 

Go get a life!
 
Senseless post.  No need for it.

Go get a life!
 
Senseless post.  No need for it.

If BFC put CM on Steam, it doesn't mean they'd have to stop selling it on their own site. See Eagle Dynamics. For those who don't know who they are, they're only one of the best flight sim devs out there today. You can get their product either on Steam or on their website. Imagine that.
 
As starter of the first CM on Steam thread way back when, I used to think it was a good idea. Not sure about it now, considering what BFC has been putting out is borderline half-baked shovelware with problems that don't get fixed for months and months and months. Not to mention their retarded mess of an upgrade system. BFC would get pilloried by the Steam users, and rightly so. Although, maybe a good kick in the pants is what BFC needs to get their QC back in gear.

I am in.