stoat
-
Posts
1,338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by stoat
-
-
Methinks this was posted in the General Forum several weeks ago. Me also thinks that the Brits in question were landing in Lebanon, and had nothing to do with Iraq. Me also thinks Joe Shaw is needlessly contributing to the mess of threads that deserve to die painful and neglected deaths, but never seem to do so.
-
I'd like to have a turn more than I'd like either of the DoC related options.Originally posted by NG cavscout:I thought you would like me better as a parole officer than Lamar as a probe officer... I guess you have different priorities.
-
The US Army wasn't desegregated until 1948. Blacks had to serve in separate combat units, though led almost entirely by white officers. Perhaps that's what you meant, and I just misunderstood. *shrugs*Originally posted by Michael Dorosh:(and in US combat units as a matter of policy, black were segregated out until late in the war)
-
If I had known NG cavscout was going to be my parole officer, I would have opted to stay in prison.
-
Do you have a wireless network in your house or is everything connected with wires.
Surge protectors are your friend. Daisy chain a couple if you wish, but they are a cheap way to prevent expensive problems.
-
Does that require pants?Originally posted by Joe Shaw:Arise Sir Stoat! Claim your spurs! (And sign this chit for them, would you please? Sure, you can use a crayon.)
-
This just in: Gnomish man in battering ram equipped kayak collapses Minneapolis bridge, runs naked into woods. Details at 11.
-
Really? Well, here's one that leaves that laying in the dust:Originally posted by Boo Radley:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by stoat:
That's the falsest statement I've heard in the last 45 minutes, ya nancy.
You're intellegent, good looking and we all respect you very, very much!</font>
-
Oh... well, you have no turn now because you haven't looked in your IN box you neutron-star dense misanthrope. </font>Originally posted by Boo Radley:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by stoat:
Yes, the word "was" explained why there was no turn then, but does sodd-all to explain why I have no turn now.
-
Yes, the word "was" explained why there was no turn then, but does sodd-all to explain why I have no turn now.
-
I wants to skewer him, but I wants slightly more not to be banned.Originally posted by Stuka:Hooboy, this has been one of the best days on the forum in YEARs!
Watching BUM$SLAPPER commit Seppuku out there has been a hoot.
I'm orf to beddybyes now so the rest of you idjits, play nice with assmonkey-boy.....
-
You would make conversation with a waffler before you would send me a turn? For shame, sir. For shame.
-
We have been lucky this far that the CMSF tactics forum has attracted zero moderating attention. I'm sure we could go back and forth for quite some time, but it's obvious from the way the thread has developed that nothing would be accomplished, except for perhaps a couple of bans. At this point I would be alright with you thinking of me as an assmonkey, or fag hag, or whatever, as I will certainly still consider you to be an asshole. It is most certainly in both of our best interests to go our separate ways, and I, for one, will not post anything else in this thread. Adieu, BOOM$LANG.Originally posted by B00M$LANG:Whatever he said over the course of many posts.
-
I like the way you operate. First, you call the people that posted in the thread "assmonkeys" and say in no uncertain terms that we're all flaming homosexuals. Then you proceed to the next page and make a lengthy post, that while being trite and arrogant, is slightly apologetic and makes more sense than anything else you have posted to date. If you were really interested in tactics, you could have turned your back on the assmonkeys and posted something so tactically brilliant that the rest of us would be awed at the sight of your handle until kingdom come. I, for one, know you are this brilliant, because after all, you have experience. However, you could not do this. You descended into the muck with best of them, while making sure to let everyone know that you were in fact taking the moral high ground.Originally posted by B00M$LANG:Insert text from last two Boom$lang posts here. (excluding the assmonkey etymology post)
This merely illustrates the point that you are now, and more than likely will always be, a complete asshole.
-
I enjoy how you went back and typed something (and avoided the edit time stamp) so now it seems like I simply deleted your text and added an inane comment. </font>Originally posted by Joe Shaw:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by stoat:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by NG cavscout:
jeez, Stoat, don't you have anything better to do than jump in and correct your betters? Well, since I owe you a turn, I guess not too much...
-
I enjoy how you went back and typed something (and avoided the edit time stamp) so now it seems like I simply deleted your text and added an inane comment.Originally posted by NG cavscout:jeez, Stoat, don't you have anything better to do than jump in and correct your betters? Well, since I owe you a turn, I guess not too much...
-
M29 Weasel. Used as a prime mover and plane taxi at airfields, also as a resupply vehicle for combat units in inhospitable terrain. It failed massively in the latter role, especially during the Heurtgen forest debacle.Originally posted by Lars:btw, anybody know what the hell this is?
-
There you go CupOHerpes, one PBEM RT setup in the post. (Hey you chose the sides, only fair)Originally posted by NG cavscout:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Bunyip:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by CupOHemlock:
blah...blah...blah...snap...twirl (again)
COH
Hmmm maybe tcp/ip over Royal Mail wasn't such a good idea, will try carrier pidgeon next. </font>
-
In my experience the game likes to work with straight lines. However, if one flank is advanced a fair amount more than the rest of your front, that flank will be included in the next setup phase, but not the whole line. I guess I'm trying to say that the game prefers a straight front, but you will see bulges and salients if you move forward in one area with appreciable strength.Originally posted by PLM2:Quick question, in some operations, in new battles your setup zone seems to be a flat across the map area. While in others it seems it more goes where your troops go instead of in a straight line.
For example if I moved up one flank of the map, would i have to capture the terrain along the rest of the map to be able to setup there?
They won't get resupply or replacements, but I believe that you can return them to friendly lines.Also I seem to remember being unable to move surrounded units and they got supplied less? I dont know where my manual is, appreciate the help -
Was his name Leslie? He's down the street, in the Furry Teacup. You're confusing this thread with the red light district. Have a nice day, and SOD OFF posthaste.Originally posted by thewood:I was told someone would be waiting for me here.
-
Ah. It seemed to me that there were two options. You were either joking, or you were being an insufferable asshole. I hoped for the former, but it seems that you are capable only of the latter.Originally posted by B00M$LANG:I don't joke about war, sonny...it's nothing to joke about...unless we're talking about the French military...
-
-
Your lisp. I have a hard time trying to decipher it myself.Originally posted by Joe Shaw:What's so hard to understand?
[ July 30, 2007, 01:09 PM: Message edited by: stoat ]
-
We need more threads!!!
Seanachai the Headless Peng Challenger
in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Posted