StrykerPSG
Members-
Posts
135 -
Joined
-
Last visited
StrykerPSG's Achievements
Senior Member (3/3)
10
Reputation
-
An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
StrykerPSG replied to RescueToaster's topic in Combat Mission Cold War
Thanks for the clarification. I now recall that similar image, when the parts were all available. I remember being told to never try a frontal shot, only flank or rear shots to maximize a higher chance of a kill shot. They were indeed renown for being inaccurate and unreliable, as would become amplified during expenditure of older stock. -
StrykerPSG reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
RescueToaster reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
RescueToaster reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
StrykerPSG replied to RescueToaster's topic in Combat Mission Cold War
It is indeed, but actually a separate sight, added to the day sight. They were always 2 pieces, as the combined weight of both sights would be a bit cumbersome for extended carrying. The day sight(tracker) is an SU-36P and the AN-TAS-5 gets added for night operations. Here's the link: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/23-24/Ch1.htm Now trying to remember the night picture on the sight, maybe it was thermal and I am confusing the sight picture with AN/TVS-5 sight picture, which was very much starlight. I just remember the issue was getting batteries and coolant for the night sight and while batteries were in abundance, the coolant was not always readily available. Then, there were issues with the batteries and over-heating. Just not a reliable system overall. -
Vanir Ausf B reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
StrykerPSG replied to RescueToaster's topic in Combat Mission Cold War
US never bought the Dragon III, which had a newer sight with day/night capability in one unit. Dragon and Dragon II only had a day sight and you would attach an AN/PVS-5 (AN/TAS-5, just googled it) on the tube instead, or was it attached to the sight? (attached to the sight, then onto the missile, bulky as hell, not to mention the weight). Been a while. Anyway, never thermal, but passive night vision, so challenging when there's a lack of star/moon light -
Ultradave reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
ng cavscout reacted to a post in a topic: Blurry/Pixelated Text
-
Agreed, 110%. I have been a long time subscriber and even re-bought the CMSF2 series on Steam because I want to support the team. Looking forward to the updated engine that gets tossed around from time to time. I just held off on the latest "Fire and Rubble" series till the text issue could be sorted out properly. Admittedly, wish this could be incorporated into the install, rather than playing with options or waiting for the smarter players, such as yourself, that have a fix.
-
ng cavscout reacted to a post in a topic: Blurry/Pixelated Text
-
IICptMillerII reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
StrykerPSG reacted to a post in a topic: Blurry/Pixelated Text
-
StrykerPSG reacted to a post in a topic: Blurry/Pixelated Text
-
Vanir Ausf B reacted to a post in a topic: An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
-
An early experience with the M47 Dragon in CMCW
StrykerPSG replied to RescueToaster's topic in Combat Mission Cold War
As a former 11BC10 (med AT Gunner) in my first enlistment (1983-1985), I can tell you, the M47 was indeed a system that made one nervous with regards to reliability. Though we had a trainer, it failed to reproduce the initial launching shock of the missile leaving the launcher and the follow on "popcorn" sound of the 200+ small engines igniting to keep your bird on track with your sight. More than a few dumped their missiles initially because of the surprised popping noises and the new gunner trying to get the missile to rise to their viewpoint, rather than giving enough time for it to rise to the proper sighted crosshair. The biggest reward for firing the Dragon is you no longer carried it on your back...lol. Admittedly, I studied every WP armored vehicle poster, noting the location of engine compartments and vulnerabilities on the sides and rear of WP vehicles. -
Gents, you are awesome! The blurry text in this game and Black Sea, put me off to the point of not wanting to play. I purchased this one, in hopes the development team might have fixed the problem, however, to no avail. You have indeed put forth the fix I needed to succeed and dive into this newest title. Heck, might even give their WWII releases another look. Thank you both.
-
Naughty or nice... here's some bones!
StrykerPSG replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission - General Discussion
Belated response but nice update indeed! Loved the original series and would love a reason to see a newer version on my hard drive. Looking forward to what other stuff you are developing Steve. -
Kudos to the team for trying with all their best intentions to get us this gem before Christmas. I would much rather have a refined product that proudly shows your title accordingly, with minimal issues then a bug fest filled with agitation by the end user, just to make a hard coded delivery date. Your team has always delivered top notch releases and this one should be no different. Take the time it needs to be released in it's best state. Thank you for the public statement and causing some to have less anxiety attacks counting down to the 25th....Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you and the team Matt
-
LOL, I cheated and bought a 40" LCD TV that runs my desktop resolution....it looks marvelous! I was actually shocked how inexpensive a 40" LCD TV was, about $400. It's been the best electronic purchase in a few years.
-
I've been eyeballing it for quite some time, just had some other priorities during the release. Now, if it were to say, go on sale.....Christmas is a coming. I will indeed pick it up, just been slacking a bit but I appreciate the kudos for the game.
-
I about fell outta my chair laughing when I read that one........sorry to disappoint you. Regarding the "It's done when it's done.....I acknowledge and will go back to my hide until I get that great email talking about my downloadable item is ready. Thanks Matt
-
So, having bought every CMSF module, as well as every WWII module, sans Italy, I love this series. But, I have to ask, having bought this latest iteration as soon as I saw the link, what's the expected ETA? Mind you, I'm not looking for the exact dates though that would be great too, but at least a projected quarter, winter, spring, summer, etc... Anyway, very much looking forward to this latest installment. Cheers, Matt PS, if it was announced elsewhere, my apologies for overlooking the link.
-
Status update on "Black Sea"
StrykerPSG replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Any chance of posting updated screen shots, preferably action shots? As someone that purchased every module for the last CMSF series, I very much look forward to what this new series will bring to the table. Also, if you're ever in need of an additional beta tester, I'm always available........ Matt -
Team, I thought I had already purchased Market Garden for CMBN, after I just installed the 3.0 upgrade. If I purchase Market Garden now, do I have to uninstall everything or does Market Garden now ship as 3.0? Thanks
-
Off-map mortars ridiculously inaccurate?
StrykerPSG replied to afreu's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Aaargh! Search the forums peoples..........kidding, sorta. I think BFC has done a pretty good job of incorporating the multitudes of factors that would affect indirect fire, including experience level of the FO's, weather, LOS and overall reaction of the crews to various events, such as setting up in a tree line. They have even made calling for missions if out of radio contact impossible until comms are established. Professionally, not sure of anyone else that ever incorporated so many real world issues successfully as BFC has done. It is because of their attentions to detail that I have bought everything they've made for CMSF and after. Anyway, there are at least four other threads about the trials and tribulations of indrect fire. I would heartily recommend finding them and see the other observations your comrades have found in this latest iteration. I would be willing to bet you would be hard pressed to find anyone giving this level of detail to such a simple weapon system. Matt