Ronn

Thanks Moon for your quick answer But ... Husband after work: "Darling, where is my lunch?" Answer: "Oh, no problem, you can find it in the cookbook on page 45" Translated: Customer after reading the newsletter: "Battlefront, where is my free Strategy Guide?" Answer: "Oh, no problem, you can find it at CDV's webpage, but you must contact ... write, ... respond, ...declare ... Sorry Moon, but if I offer my custumer a free guide (with verry big letters), it's my part to deliver a clear functional link ... In my opinion If this was Microsoft, I would say "keep your .....guide". But this is Battlefront, my all time favorite wargaming company. So I say .... no problem ...

Hallo Battlefront I received your informativ newsletter, where you offer to get the Theatre of War – Free Strategy Guide. If I follow the link I get to a login page "Games Press login". If I follow the other link I get a 2 page sample from the Strategy Guide. Could you please tell me, how do I get the Free Strategy Guide? Greetings Rolf

I like CMSF, but also I think they are right with there review. I'm a long time gamer since 64' times and Gamespot is one of the few gaming mags, who I agree with there review in about 90 %.

Yeah ... But when you train some years, look at replays from Starcraft, C&C, Generals & Co your clickspeed will araise and then the possibility is there that your clicks are faster than your oponents. Ah.. what .. this is Combat Mission? A tactical Wargame? Oh sorry ... Thougt I was at the Company of Heroes forum ... (Sorry, but only my two cents ...)

Close Combat is a VERY (!) SLOW game and so it's controllable. And you get everytime the big picture! CM:CF is a fast game and you can only take your attention to one or two POI's. The only experience from the RT-aspect for me was time pressure ...

Yep, but we need a Forum for Scenario Design. I think many complainer about this feature would first take a look overthere ... (HINT Battlefront *g* HINT *gg*)

Same here. One of the best games I bought this year, and that do I say, with the awareness of the bugs, disappointment about RT, missing features, the WEGO that is no WEGO, TacAi and so on ... Great game with much potential

Very good thread! But why ist there no Forum for Scenario Design? That is a must for this game. Please Battlefront

No, you can't check back on other parts of the battlefield and check out what has happend in the last seconds on the other points of action. A battlefield has many points of action, but people have only one attention. For many wargamer this is like blindness. Other games with RTS aspect - for example Close Combat - shows you the big picture and expand very, very slow ... So it's better controllable

The LOS-tool not only is for LOS. It was a good tool for terrain analyzes. I expected more LOS-tools, to get a better big picture from the 3D battlefield on a flat 2D computer monitor. For example: Conquest of the Aegan has three LOS-Tools. But overal,CM:SF is a very good game with much potenzial.

Could you please stop with this childish kind of argumentation? What Janster said was right. This game is a good game, but need much work and tuning for usability and gameplay ...

Yep - one of the things I expectet: - Hulldown - more LOS-Tools (free LOS ...) - 3D-analysis tools to get a better pic of the situations on your flat monitor screen ... - ...

That is exactly my impression. And therfore I think, BATTLEFRONT will listen to the community and with some time the gem will be polish in the right way

Sorry Redwolf, tryed RT very hard .. but the action takes place in many parts of the battlefield. In RT I can correct one or two of this situations not more. I can't get back the WEGO-minute to see, what has happend on on the other side of the battlefield. RT ist time pressure pur, and the ESC-pause a nice feature. Not more. just my two cents By the way: I love this game! I enjoy every minute, but only the WEGO-aspekt

yes same here ... One another point: With the RC-menue you haven't to move your eyes to another part of the screen, you can focus only on the action and give your orders. It's a question of usability ...