Jump to content

Panzer_M

Members
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

About Panzer_M

  • Birthday 07/12/1981

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    Der PanzerLehrer
  • Website URL
    http://www.OrlandoForums.com

Converted

  • Location
    Orlando, FL
  • Interests
    WW II and Autos.
  • Occupation
    Sales

Panzer_M's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

0

Reputation

  1. I hate tanks..and esp tank heavy battles...reminds me of a good ol C&C Red Alert Tank Rush. when I do anything which is rather rare since I don't have the time to make good(Real) maps. I use Infantry and SPGs mostly. Tend to stay away from the Mech/SS/FJ/Guards/ect units and just deal with the basic infantry for most nations in CMBB and CMAK. and I also hate being told how to play out a battle. Let me figure that out on my own, I'll either win or lose....I figured that out on start up.
  2. A bit offtopic..well alot what if the defense industry went with the notion of the StuG/Pz IV being the stable of the armour and designs for the PzKw VI and V were left on the boards. So the resources weren't wasted on the Tigers, Panthers and their SPG versions. thinking of the StuG III ausf. G which was cheaper and quicker to produce and with it's 7.5cm Kwk and 8cm of armour was still up to date with what the allies could field. how would they have fielded?
  3. I got a few new skins downloaded, mainly for the StuG and Panzer III and I am having trouble getting them to take, what do I need to do? is it like install mods for CloseCombat?
  4. Did the germans ever use captured examples officially?
  5. 3ser ti(Hatches) are like StuGs, cheaper than most of the others, tougher suspensions that all the other 92-99 3ser
  6. well a green crew, being shelled from a crack AT Gun may panic, even if it's not going through the 3.7cm round is louder than a rifle round on impacting the armour. IIRC 37mm rounds made for busting concert bunkers worked on thicker armoured tanks.
  7. I read it in the bathroom. it's decent. isn't there a few others by the author?
  8. where can i get them if they exist? thanks Panzer.
  9. you know another wargame that promised to be good and sucked s. GI combat. but it was supposed to be an improvement on the classic Close Combat. CMx1 was good, cause in reality there was nothing else close. CMx2 looks like Brothers in Arms in Iraq.
  10. Modern warfare sucks. it's more or less then empire vs the serf. and saddly the serfs tend to kick the empire in the nuts before it ends. A superpower vs a 3rd world ****box isn't fun to watch on the news and doesn't make a compelling game to those who enjoy the tactics of WWII, or even war prior to that, when a war of manuever was key. maybe it's cause i can't relate to it. I found out in College ROTC my thinking of military matters was dated, and this push-button army we have today I hold no passion for. Pretty much had no interest in Balkans of Fire as it's a flash-bang simfest CM:SF hopefully will be better than i am reading tonight. but I am fearfully of a modern flash/bang fest over something that has real substance.
  11. Is there going to be a h2h campaign in CMx2? if not that's boring really quick even against good AI.
  12. It's Close Combat and Atomic all over again have a great idea/game, try to make it more mainstream. F everything up.
×
×
  • Create New...