Sanmaya

well you might take out realism or not but what is more important you cannot loosse the game when playing with ussr neutral you simply conquer all neutral lands, turkey , iray , sweden norway, vicyfrance, spain , portugal, greece, yugoslavia... and russia does nothing??? not really realistic when hitler invaded yugoslavia, the soviets were i doubt wether or not to take up arms... but they thougth, time was not good.. so they didn't. but well, so you put ussr on neutral, you simply conquer all neutral lands, turkey , iray , sweden norway, vicyfrance, spain , portugal, greece, yugoslavia then you conquer with your massive amount of mp's england..., you will get then triple usa/allied mp's, you conquer england then you conquer usa and then you declare war on ussr.. because they are are neutral they just sit back, let you take the whole damn world, including their allies, and do nothing well when you finally attack them in 1944, of course with an overpowered force of 5-1, because you othermight loose, an migth get an exiting game you will get triple soviet mp's, and can't simply not loosse it looks like you are a bit of a coward to me, to play that way every kid can win that way btw axis are already at advantage, so why do you need to delay ussr entry? if you want, i will play a game against you anytime, you can be allied WITHOUT ussr as neutral, but as random i'll show youn how axis kick ass -Sanmaya

and don't forget, axis get for bagdad, 30 turns, 10 mp.....=300 mp so with the usa loss(of later joining) of 3x 180 mp=540 and the ussr loss of at least 2 x +/- 450 mp= 900 i think taking only the oilfields in iray is VERY unprofiteble, if bagdad is not taken

the computer is to stupid it's annoying soemtimes

I'm in to i play by email only kaiser_1982@hotmail.com is mine