Jump to content

xediel

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

xediel's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

0

Reputation

  1. i would like to concede my game against gavrok for i don't have time to finish it.. i'm really sorry to end it this way but i really don't have time.. anyway it was fun playing the tournamet and i wish my oponnent the best of luck in the next round.. the delays were mostly my fault so this is the only fair thing to do.. ok people have fun
  2. heavy fighting in france ! i'm still succesing in pluging all the holes and making some kills but the germans keep rushing in and their superior air advantage gives them a punching power that is shattering my defensive wall.. destroyed a tank unit this turn but i fear the one that is still loose on the battlefield could do much damage.. i'm holding on in greece but i can see the italians got something cooking in the background.. trying to take tobruk but still no luck.. have to keep trying.. anyway what happens in the few next turns is going to shape the game... regreting now that lc gambit that i didn't make on the 2nd turn, had the manpower that's for sure ! [ July 23, 2003, 09:07 AM: Message edited by: xediel ]
  3. i'm not sure.. have to play test this but i think you get better damage results when the intercept occurs especially if the intercepting af is concieved from sight... anyway i'm not going to worry too much about this... i'm off too bed..
  4. yes but still... 1 axis bomber 1 axis air fleet 1 british carrier it happens in this order: 1. axis attacks the carrier with bomber 2. a message appears "british interceptors" (interceptors of the carrier that is being attacked) 3. a message appears "german interceptors" 4.damage taken by both sides (carrier and af) 5. bomber unit bombs the carrier and they exchange damage is this what is supposed to happen ? this doesn't happen in hotseat ! in hotseat: 1. axis attacks the carrier with bomber and bombs it with no interceptors, they exchange damage and that is that
  5. why doesn't it then work in hotseat???.. if that is true then there is a bug in hotseat ! i don't know for tcp/ip.. played only a couple of tcp/ip games
  6. in pbem when you attack a carrier with bomber unit and you have a af in vicinity you will get an intercept for that carrier with your af and consequently your bomber will get a clear damage free attack on carrier making devastating damage ! i was stunned when i lost a carrier in that way in my game against gavrok so i playtested it a few times so this is 100 % correct info ! [ July 18, 2003, 11:31 PM: Message edited by: xediel ]
  7. nice idea except the audio part it's way too long.. the audio should be a single sentance maximum !
  8. Comrade Trapp why just vietnam and korea you could add many more but i don't wan't to argue about wars, profit.. it's clear that i won't change my views you won't change yours and let's end it now cause this really doesn't belong here.. [ July 16, 2003, 09:20 PM: Message edited by: xediel ]
  9. Comrade Trapp profit does not exclusively mean money ! look it up in the dictionary !
  10. sure if it was not for the U.S war machine europe would be probably overrun but don't go kidding ourselves.. wars aren't conducted out of good will nor charity.. they are a product of politics and that means interest... we all know germany needed the war but so did america (thousands of new jobs and a boost for the fallen economy) this is my point: if it wasn't for the recession in U.S no one would give a rat's ass for what happened in europe for there was no real danger for america itself.. so please don't go telling about the "helping" but don't get me wrong it's ok doing something for yourself and eventuate later on as a good guy.. moreover it's a positive thing ! and sure.. they do not care now and did not care then.. it's also true that.. why would they care.. when it's done it's done and the damage has been already done anyway who gives a **** what happens somwhere over the mountain.. it's not about the freedom and well being of others as they are makin us believe.. who thinks that is a god damned fool and a naive romanticist.. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE PROFIT !!!
  11. hmmmm... it has potential but it should be worked upon :cool:
  12. we played a lot of risk this winter.. and i can say it's all about the diplomacy.. not strength nor strategy... it's the common macchiavelli lobbysts dream which leads to lots of real world hostility and argue.. why me ? younogooddirtylowdown.. you could say it's all about: pick your saddam ! look at him his massing his forces he's the biggest on the map, you know i'm peaceful i wouldn't attack you you know i wouldn't.. you must have a hell of a lot charisma and pesonality to convince all you are the good guy and someone else is the saddam or else play against all odds ! you discover things you didn't know about your backstabbing "friends" ! anyway it's lots of fun but people take it far too much seriously and personally which takes me to the point... for me playing pbem is kind of casual and without tension and people are more based on fun and pure gameplay rather than tcp/ip where all are trying to prove something..
  13. would it be a problem to send a few screenshots too ?!
×
×
  • Create New...