Jump to content

__Yossarian0815[jby]

Members
  • Content Count

    810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About __Yossarian0815[jby]

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1969

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://none

Converted

  • Location
    Austria
  • Interests
    wargames
  • Occupation
    wargamer :O)

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The ideology was well established before Hitler joined, so Nazism would have been a political factor in any case. Wheteher they could have taken over Germany without him, who knows?
  2. I totally agree, but I was being snarky that the US would not be amused if the envisioned 2% of GDP weren´t spent at least in part on US arms.
  3. Fair enough. Budget and intentions is true for all sides. For fun´s sake (before this thread is locked) imagine Europe actually integrating its armies and actually spending 2% of GDP but not on US arms.
  4. Defence spending: Nato europe: 1,5% of GDP, Russia: 4,3% of GDP Nato Europe GDP: 17 trn $, Russia 1,6 trn$ (do the math)
  5. What Euri asked, and in addition if you installed from the newest complete installer (V2.01), is the campaign fixed?
  6. Also had a hard time with this at first, but then I discovered: bit of a spoiler: The bradleys contain Javelin launchers.
  7. Thank god I keep an email archive back to the early 2000s. My CMSF1 purchase wasn´t in the database anymore.
  8. How were the scenario victory conditions converted from CMSF to CMSF2? Since CMSF2 will support the much improved victory conditions of CMx2 V4, were the scenarios upgraded in this respect?
  9. CMSF2 yay! CMRT endwar module , will there also be a battle for Vienna map? prettyplease
  10. same here... new Win10 update also killed my laptop´s sleep mode
  11. There is a MacOS symbol next to windows download. Other than that it all went smoothly.
  12. Works fine, thank you! Not important at all, but while I have your attention, how does CMH tell which version the game is? CMSF, CMFI, CMBS, CMFB are displayed correctly CMBN, CMA not
  13. For one, even in 1944/45 practically all forests in europe were managed, so trees never got that big. For two if all forests are made up of giant redwoods in CM, they should be depicted that way. We can expect that from a simulation that also happens to be a game
  14. I insist on the correct nomenclature which is: "kevlar trees" If somebody could organize a tank, live rounds and a few trees I would financially support the experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...