Jump to content

Mr Byte

Members
  • Posts

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mr Byte

  • Birthday 02/28/1964

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.ssfl2000.co.uk
  • ICQ
    174728950

Converted

  • Location
    Coventry/England
  • Interests
    games/american football/soccer
  • Occupation
    printer/hitman

Mr Byte's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (3/3)

1

Reputation

  1. yeah but theres the thing, its not unusual in CMBN these kind kills are routine, this shot was about 900 m through trees at a hull down target while under fire (artillery rounds from a 105 landing all around.) It feels a lot like CMSF to me, all that's changed is the shape of the tanks but they are equally as lethal as a M1 or challenger. Panther 75 ---------- 97% at 500m, 65% at 750m, 35% at 1000m like I said two first shot kills at nearly 900m through trees at hull down targets while under fire makes a mockery of the above data really.....and yes they where my fireflys and thats not the only time I've seen this they were in the open not hull down with a bunch of trees in between and he wasn't underfire
  2. Whens the patch due...I have to try and finish one of my PBEMs before its out, this bug is the only thing keeping me in it right now...its like attack of the swarming Shermans!!
  3. I was having trouble getting some squads to advance from a concealed wooded area When I went back and watched they were "Chatting" and "Horsing about" and one was "Snoozing"!!
  4. When I place the BRZ file in my z folder I get nothing The Panthers appear the same as before what am i doing wrong?
  5. if you listen carefully the German is saying "look I washed for dinner" not "I surrender"
  6. It doesn't matter how loud you scream at the screen its usually too late
  7. I've noticed that both allies and axis tanks fire on the move....Is this correct? I thought the Axis tanks especially only fired stationary any grogs care to comment ps I should also say they are pretty accurate too on the move
  8. Same issue hangs on exit Operating System MS Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit SP1 CPU Intel Pentium E5300 @ 2.60GHz 40 °C Wolfdale 45nm Technology RAM 4.0GB Dual-Channel DDR2 @ 399MHz (5-5-5-18) Motherboard MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD MS-7392 (CPU1) 55 °C Graphics DELL 1905FP (1280x1024@60Hz) ATI Radeon HD 5670 Hard Drives 156GB Western Digital WDC WD1600AAJS-00B4A0 ATA Device (SATA) 37 °C 977GB SAMSUNG SAMSUNG HD103SI ATA Device (SATA) 29 °C 156GB FUJITSU MAXTOR STM3160211AS ATA Device (SATA) 37 °C Optical Drives HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH22NS40 ATA Device Audio AMD High Definition Audio Device
  9. if you listen carefully to the video AAR you can hear on of the soldiers complaining about sugar in his hair after he takes cover from the artillery
  10. all fair and true comments I'm not saying I dont agree with reinforcements or that they are not historically accurate but... its this kind of thing 2nd platoon at T+5 3rd platoon 2 tanks mortars and air support at T+15 AT elements AT T+25 because invariably it means in the scenario T+5 (finished your recon heres you a platoon to beef up your assault) T+15 (hehe you just discovered the deep entrenchments and hidden reserve hard points you need these now to defeat them) T+25 (here comes the armored counter attack better have these AT units and move them up fast) I know whenever I get armor or AT reinforcements I scour the map for the armored counter attack that I (now) know is coming I was doing a recon scenario in CMSF the other day when 20 mins in I suddenly get AT assets?? All I had found was entrenched infantry up until then Two mins later T55's are rolling toward me...but its ok I got the AT now...
  11. I have only one (purely from my point of view) thing to say I think that scenario designers in the past balance thing with reinforcements too much I know when I'm playing a scenario, lets say I'm trying to dislodge some enemy infantry and then suddenly I get some AT reinforcements I just know the enemy have just got or about to get tank support..its a bit of a realism buster for me, I would much rather have them at the start and have to position them just in case not knowing that the enemy will or wont get armor support rather than it be given away by the reinforcement schedule. Also I wonder at the reinforcements sometimes does every operation have its forces committed in such a piecemeal manner?
  12. yeah exactly! I dont know if this is a bit devisive I see it as a commander getting on the radio to HQ and asking for reinforcements, and as I said the actual arrival would be delayed. anyway its not going to happen but maybe sometime in the futre this could be added just another option for scenario designers.
×
×
  • Create New...