leakyD
-
Posts
320 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
leakyD got a reaction from markbt in Update on Black Sea release
Bunch of ravenous hyenas - go read the manual - yes, from end-to-end.
Might find a typo.
Should keep you (us?) busy for at least a day. Or two....
-
leakyD got a reaction from LUCASWILLEN05 in Update on Black Sea release
Bunch of ravenous hyenas - go read the manual - yes, from end-to-end.
Might find a typo.
Should keep you (us?) busy for at least a day. Or two....
-
leakyD got a reaction from LUCASWILLEN05 in Changing Weather
No! No! No!
MORE FIRE. As in BURNABLE terrain.
We've been wait a BIT too long for this.
Let's PLEASE not distract the BFC and let them get BURNABLE terrain in. PLEASE????
Once we have this, then, perhaps, your lovely squalls.
Maybe we'll even get lucky and the rain can work to put the fires out. Maybe.
-
leakyD got a reaction from DMS in BETA Battle IFV ATGM (Over)Use. - Bill/Pzrldr OK - NO SPOILERS!!
After seeing the "over use" of BMP/Bradley ATGM use in the Beta AAR, I had to get some clarity.
If there is supporting evidence of "generous" use of IFV ATGM as SOP for US/RU/UKR forces (hell, I'll take any army at this point), then someone smack me on the head with it.
If not, then this will need to be tweaked prior to ship. Bradley & BMP3 (haven't seen BMP2 use, yet - is this a bug specific to BMP3/Bradley?).
Otherwise there are going to be some SERIOUS tactical issues with IFV overuse of ATGM.
This will be especially important when facing APS equipped vehicles.
NO Beta AAR SPOILERS here, as it'd be great to get Bill's/Pzrldr's opinions/views here.
Can any Dev's chime in here? Yes, stop eating leftovers and chime in.
