Larsen

Artkin, it is a known bug. I guess BFC will fix it when it fixes it.

Whatever the last one is. Engine 4.

The drones are there. They are mostly for observation purposes. You can call arty using them. There is some fictional equipment that did not exist in 2017 - like APS on Bradleys and Abrams, Russian T-90am (with 0 rarity!) that just got in service a couple of years ago etc. It was a wild guess back on 2013-2015. But for the most it is accurate.

You are right. Not sure why I thought that T-72B3M was in the game. Sorry.

Yes, i know. That's why i asked. U am curious if anyone had a chance to compare. One thing that i noticed is that t-90am spots better with the presence of a zala drone

I found an article that states that the FCS and thermal sights are about the same in both models. The difference is that since R-90AM has a bigger turret the sensors are positioned more compactly and the tank profile is lower than T-72B3M. I will do some testing and see if i see any difference in spotting.

Hm. Different sources state that T-72B3M should have the same CITV as T-90M. In fact there seems to be very little difference between the two tanks.

Thank you!

Yes. I want to know how they differ in game especially in terms of spotting. From my perspective if they spot the same the extra points for T-90am could be used elsewhere. Do you have experience using them in CMBS?

Does anybody know what are the differences between T-90am and T-72B3M for the purposes of CMBS? The former costs about 70 points more and I am curious if it is worth spending those points on T-90am or better use them elsewhere. The most important question is does anyone know if T-90am spots better? Please, leave all the political discussions out of this thread. Thank you.

No. It is there in all versions.

@c3K, do you have any idea when this will be fixed? It is a game breaking bug for CMBS as far as I am concerned. The only Russian tank that actually can spot anything has a super fragile front hull armor. they don't have to wait for the whole patch release, you know, to fix this.

Please, let's take the political discussion out of this thread. This thread is about representation of T-90 in CMBS. Please, focus on that.

Let's not turn this into a discussion what Russia will or will not do and how in the future regarding its military. Let's focus on the very specific subject - CMBS.

What rebuilding? They have about 2800 tank in active service (half of them are T-72 variants) and another 10000 in reserve. If you look at what they use and what they lose it is outdated old models and old ammunition from 70- tirs and 80-ties. That is what the US did in Iraq in 91. They pretty much used the bombs that they had in storage from the Vietnam era. Loosing 300 T-71B3M will not even make a dent in their armor.